Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996835›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Why should stakeholders consider the effect of tensions in collaborative innovation in healthcare-lessons learned from surveying integrated care projects in Germany.

Malte Haring, Juliane Schiller, Martin Gersch, Volker Amelung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malte HaringHannover Medical School, Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany. Malte.U.Haring@stud.mh-hannover.de.
Juliane Schillerinav- Private Institute for Applied Health Services Research GmbH, Schiffbauerdamm 12, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
Martin GerschDepartment of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Garystr. 21, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
Volker AmelungHannover Medical School, Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe German Innovation Fund supports projects that aim to improve healthcare through integration and intersectoral collaboration. As is typical for collaborative innovation projects, partners often pursue different objectives, which can create tensions and affect outcomes. The study aims to explore the causes and effects of tensions in integrated care projects and how frameworks, processes, and management should be designed to deal with tensions and achieve their productive effects.

methodsIn an online survey we asked participants about the causes, effects, and management of tensions and their implications for integrated care projects (n = 58 completed questionnaires). We applied bivariate descriptive statistics to analyse the quantitative data.

resultsTensions between stakeholders, caused by deep-seated differences and the design of the project frameworks, often affect the course and outcome of innovative integrated care projects. However, through appropriate conflict management and negotiation processes such tensions can be managed constructively and lead to better outcomes. DISCUSSION: Tension is usually seen as something unpleasant to be avoided and/or overcome. In fact, tensions can have positive effects, the importance of which remains little understood. Developing appropriate frameworks for managing and integrating different perspectives are key factors in unlocking the positive potential of tensions in integrated care projects.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth FacilitiesGermanyHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesContradictionsImplementationInnovationIntegrated care projectsTensions

Identifiers

PMID37996835
PMCPMC10668511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.