Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996824›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Acute management of fractures in primary care - a cost minimisation analysis.

Stein Vabo, Egil Kjerstad, Steinar Hunskaar, Knut Steen, Christina Brudvik, Tone Morken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stein VaboNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Box 22, Nygårdstangen, Bergen, NO-5838, Norway. stein.vabo@hotmail.com.
Egil KjerstadDepartment of Social Science and Health, Health Services and Health Economics Research Group, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Nygårdsgaten 112, Bergen, NO-5008, Norway.
Steinar HunskaarNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Box 22, Nygårdstangen, Bergen, NO-5838, Norway.
Knut SteenMinor Injury Department, Orthopaedic Division, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Christina BrudvikDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, Bergen, NO-5020, Norway.
Tone MorkenNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Box 22, Nygårdstangen, Bergen, NO-5838, Norway.
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Norway, primary healthcare has first-line responsibility for all medical emergencies, including traumas and fractures. Normally, patients with suspected fractures are referred to specialist care in hospitals. However, the cooperating municipalities of Bykle and Valle have X-ray facilities and handle minor fractures locally. The aim of this study was to estimate the costs of X-ray diagnosis and initial treatment of fractures at the local primary care centre compared with initial transport and treatment in hospital.

methodsWe conducted a cost minimisation analysis by comparing expected costs of initial examination with X-ray and treatment of patients with fractures or suspected fractures at two possible sites, in the local municipality or at the hospital. A cost minimisation analysis is an economic evaluation based on the assumption that the outcomes of the two treatment procedure regimens are equal. Costs were estimated in Euros (EUR) using 2021 mean exchange rates.

resultsIn 2019, we identified a total of 403 patients with suspected fractures in the two municipalities. Among these, 12 patients bypassed the primary care system as they needed urgent hospital care. A total of 391 injured patients were assessed with X-ray at the primary health care centres, 382 received their initial treatment there, and nine were referred to hospital. In an alternative hospital model, without X-ray and treatment possibilities in the municipality, the 382 patients would have been sent directly to hospital for radiological imaging and treatment. The total cost was estimated at EUR 367,756 in the hospital model and at EUR 69,835 in the primary care model, a cost saving of EUR 297,921.

conclusionBased on cost minimisation analysis, this study found that radiological diagnosis of suspected fractures and initial treatment of uncomplicated fractures in primary care cost substantially less than transport to and treatment in hospital.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansNorwayPrimary Health CareConservative treatmentDiagnosisEconomicsEvaluationFamily practiceFracturesPrimary healthcareTeleradiology

Identifiers

PMID37996824
PMCPMC10668448
OpenAlexW4388939420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.