Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996810›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2023

Benchmarking MicrobIEM - a user-friendly tool for decontamination of microbiome sequencing data.

Claudia Hülpüsch, Luise Rauer, Thomas Nussbaumer, Vera Schwierzeck, Madhumita Bhattacharyya, Veronika Erhart, Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann, Matthias Reiger, Avidan U Neumann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Skin microbiome analysis of a junctional epidermolysis bullosa patient treated with genetically modified stem cells.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Article
  4. Nationwide multicentre study of Nanopore long-read sequencing for 16S rRNA-species identification.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia Hülpüsch *Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-1356
Luise Rauer *Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7970-2678
Thomas NussbaumerInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Helmholtz Munich, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4922-1966
Vera SchwierzeckInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Helmholtz Munich, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4254-3700
Madhumita BhattacharyyaEnvironmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7671-6967
Veronika ErhartEnvironmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Claudia Traidl-HoffmannEnvironmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5085-5179
Matthias Reiger *Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6173-2104
Avidan U Neumann *Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany. avidan.neumann@uni-a.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2149-5917
University of Augsburg · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiome analysis is becoming a standard component in many scientific studies, but also requires extensive quality control of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing data prior to analysis. In particular, when investigating low-biomass microbial environments such as human skin, contaminants distort the true microbiome sample composition and need to be removed bioinformatically. We introduce MicrobIEM, a novel tool to bioinformatically remove contaminants using negative controls.

resultsWe benchmarked MicrobIEM against five established decontamination approaches in four 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing datasets: three serially diluted mock communities (10

conclusionsMicrobIEM's ratio filter for decontamination performs better or as good as established bioinformatic decontamination tools. In contrast to established tools, MicrobIEM additionally provides interactive plots and supports selecting appropriate filtering parameters via a user-friendly graphical user interface. Therefore, MicrobIEM is the first quality control tool for microbiome experts without coding experience.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaBenchmarkingDecontaminationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingBioinformatic decontaminationDecontamLow-biomass microbiomeNegative controlSourceTrackerYouden’s index

Identifiers

PMID37996810
PMCPMC10666409
OpenAlexW4388942949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.