Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996800›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Usage and health perception of cannabidiol-containing products among the population in Germany: a descriptive study conducted in 2020 and 2021.

Johanna Geppert, Julika Lietzow, Stefanie Hessel-Pras, Fabian Kirsch, Bernd Schäfer, Benjamin Sachse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Treatment demand for cannabis use problems: analyses of routine data from 30 European countries.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prevalence of cannabidiol use and correlates in U.S. adults.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johanna GeppertGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, Berlin, 10589, Germany. Johanna.Geppert@bfr.bund.de.
Julika LietzowGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, Berlin, 10589, Germany.
Stefanie Hessel-PrasGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, Berlin, 10589, Germany.
Fabian KirschGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, Berlin, 10589, Germany.
Bernd SchäferGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, Berlin, 10589, Germany.
Benjamin SachseGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, Berlin, 10589, Germany.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCannabidiol (CBD), a non-intoxicating substance of Cannabis sativa L., is gaining consumer attention. Yet, legal regulations in the EU are complex and questions of potential health risks remain partly unanswered. In Germany, little is known about people who use CBD products. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to gain insight into the user group of CBD, reasons for consumption and risk perception towards CBD-containing products.

methodsThe study consisted of two parts: In the first part of the study, the prevalence of CBD awareness and usage in Germany was estimated using a telephone survey and a population-representative sample of n = 1,011 respondents. Based on these results, n = 2,000 participants being aware of CBD were surveyed with an online questionnaire in the second part of the study to examine usage and perception of CBD in users and non-users.

resultsWhen the study was conducted at the end of 2020 and beginning of 2021, 40.2% of the German participants had already heard of products containing CBD, and 11.4% had actually used them. 42.1% of the users consumed such products regularly, at least once a week, primarily orally via oils or tinctures, and purchased them mainly online. Besides curiosity - addressed especially in young adults - anticipated health benefits including pain and stress relief were main reasons for use. More than half of the study participants perceived the health benefits of CBD use as high or very high. In contrast, the health risks were rated as low or very low by most respondents. Assumptions about official testing for safety as well as physical effects of CBD-containing products varied between users and non-users.

conclusionAbout one in nine people in Germany uses CBD-containing products. Given reasons for consumption and perception of potential health risks and benefits suggest that people are insufficiently informed about CBD-containing products. The results of the study indicate that risk communication is needed to raise awareness for the topic and to inform (potential) users.

Indexed as

CannabidiolCannabisCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansPerceptionYoung AdultCannabidiolCannabidiolCBDConsumptionGermanyOnline surveyRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID37996800
PMCPMC10666397
OpenAlexW4388929088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.