Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996796›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

A scoping review of the self-reported compassion measurement tools.

Hu Jiang, Wenna Wang, Yongxia Mei, Zhixin Zhao, Beilei Lin, Zhenxiang Zhang

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Editorial: Applied data science in psychology.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hu JiangSchool of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Wenna WangSchool of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Yongxia MeiSchool of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Zhixin ZhaoSchool of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Beilei LinSchool of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Zhenxiang ZhangSchool of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China. zhangzx6666@126.com.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 72174184the Science and Technology Joint Funds of Zunyi Science and Technology Bureau 2023-73Youth Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China 7210041252Youth Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China 72104221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompassion is closely linked to psychological well-being, and several assessment tools have been developed and studied to assess the level of compassion in different populations and for more precise measurement. There is currently a scarcity of comprehensive knowledge about compassion-related assessment tools, and our research provides an overview of these tools.

aimsTo identify scales used to measure compassion from different flows, and to assess their measurement properties and quality.

methodsFocusing on compassion assessment tools, the authors conducted a thorough search of 10 Chinese and English databases from their establishment until August 14, 2022. Data extracted included the author, year, country, objectives, target population, as well as the primary evaluation content. Using the COSMIN checklist, the methodological quality and measurement properties of the included studies were appraised. This scoping review was registered with the Open Science Framework and followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist.

resultsThere were 15,965 papers searched, and 36 compassion-related measurement tools were identified in this study. None of the 36 studies provided possessed all nine psychometric properties, as outlined by the COSMIN criteria. On the basis of a systematic evaluation of quality, measurement qualities were ranked. The results for internal consistency and content validity were relatively favorable, whereas the results for structural validity were variable and the results for the remaining attributes were either uncertain or negative. A Venn diagram was used to illustrate the overlapping groups of compassion measurement tools based on the three-way flow of compassion. An overview of the reference instrument and theoretical basis for the included studies was provided, and half of them did not contain any theoretical or scale-based evidence.

conclusionIn this study, 36 compassion-related measuring instruments were identified, and the methodological quality and measurement properties of the included studies were acceptable. The included measurements were consistent with flows of compassion. A further focus of further research should be on developing theories in the compassion domain and developing instruments for measuring compassion that are multidimensional, multi-populations, and culturally relevant.

Indexed as

ChecklistEmpathyHumansPsychological Well-BeingPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportCompassionCompassion from othersCompassion to othersScaleScoping reviewSelf-compassion

Identifiers

PMID37996796
PMCPMC10668436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.