Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996722›Full record

ReviewGeroScience2024

Sarcopenia: no consensus, no diagnostic criteria, and no approved indication-How did we get here?

William J Evans, Jack Guralnik, Peggy Cawthon, James Appleby, Francesco Landi, Lindsay Clarke, Bruno Vellas, Luigi Ferrucci, Ronenn Roubenoff

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effects of exercise with or withoutFrontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Examining the relationship between D3Cr muscle mass, physical performance, and functional limitation in postmenopausal women.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

William J EvansUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. William.Evans@Berkeley.edu.
Jack GuralnikUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peggy CawthonCalifornia Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
James ApplebyGerontological Society of America, Washington, DC, USA.
Francesco LandiCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Lindsay ClarkeAlliance for Aging Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Bruno VellasToulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Luigi FerrucciNational Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ronenn RoubenoffTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Alliance for Aging Research · USCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USGerontological Society of America · USNational Institute on Aging · USTufts University · USUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to the role of skeletal muscle in movement and locomotion, muscle plays a critical role in a broad array of metabolic processes that can contribute to improved health or risk of disease. The age-associated loss of muscle has been termed sarcopenia. The muscle is the primary site of insulin-stimulated glucose disposal and the largest component of basal metabolic rate, directly and indirectly affects bone density, produces myokines with pleiotropic effect on muscle and other tissues including the brain, and stores essential amino acids essential for the maintenance of protein synthesis during periods of reduced food intake and stress. As such, not surprisingly deterioration of skeletal muscle health, typically operationalized as decline of muscle mass and muscle strength is both a powerful risk factor and main consequence of chronic diseases, disability, and loss of independence, and it is one of the strongest risk factors for mortality. However, skeletal muscle remains one of the most plastic of all tissues, with rapid changes in rates of protein synthesis and degradation in response to physical activity and inactivity, inflammation, and nutritional and hormonal status. This has made the development of pharmacological therapies to increase muscle mass (or prevent loss), an important goal for decades. However, while remarkable advances in the understanding of molecular and cellular regulation of muscle protein metabolism have occurred recently, there are no approved drugs for the treatment of sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle affecting millions of older people. The goal of this paper is to describe the possible reasons for the lack of new and effective pharmacotherapies to treat one of the most important risk factors for age-associated disease and loss of independence.

Indexed as

SarcopeniaAgedExerciseHumansMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthRisk FactorsBody compositionFunctional capacityMuscle massRegulatory approvalSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID37996722
PMCPMC10828356
OpenAlexW4388961040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.