Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996715›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2023

Effect of slow-release urea on intake, ingestive behavior, digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, microbial protein production, blood and ruminal parameters of sheep.

Aline Silva, José Morais Pereira Filho, Juliana Oliveira, Kevily Lucena, Pedro Mazza, Edson Silva Filho, Ariane Nascimento, Elzânia Pereira, Antônio Vaz, Analivia Barbosa and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Aline SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Campina Grande, Patos, Paraíba, 58708110, Brazil.
José Morais Pereira FilhoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Campina Grande, Patos, Paraíba, 58708110, Brazil.
Juliana OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Sergipe, Nossa Senhora da Gloria, Sergipe, 49680000, Brazil.
Kevily LucenaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Campina Grande, Patos, Paraíba, 58708110, Brazil.
Pedro MazzaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Adhemar de Barros Avenue, Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, 40170110, Brazil.
Edson Silva FilhoDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Piaui, Ininga, S/N, Teresina, Piauí, 64049-550, Brazil.
Ariane NascimentoDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Piaui, Ininga, S/N, Teresina, Piauí, 64049-550, Brazil.
Elzânia PereiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceara, Mister Hull Avenue, Fortaleza, Ceara, 60356000, Brazil.
Antônio VazDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Campina Grande, Patos, Paraíba, 58708110, Brazil.
Analivia BarbosaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Adhemar de Barros Avenue, Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, 40170110, Brazil.
Ronaldo OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Adhemar de Barros Avenue, Ondina, Salvador, Bahia, 40170110, Brazil.
Leilson BezerraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Campina Grande, Patos, Paraíba, 58708110, Brazil. leilson@ufpi.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8815-3946
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal do Piauí · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 406734/2022-4Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 423933/2021-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted two experiments. The first aimed to obtain and characterize microparticles of slow-release urea (SRU) using calcium alginate as the encapsulating agent. The second experiment evaluated their inclusion in sheep diets. In the first experiment, four treatments from a completely randomized design were employed to develop an SRU through the ionic gelification technique testing two drying methods (oven and lyophilizer) and addition or no of sulfur (S): SRU oven-dried with sulfur (MUSO) and without sulfur (MUO), SRU freeze-dried/lyophilized with (MUSL), and without sulfur (MUL). MUO exhibited better yield and encapsulation efficiency among these formulations than the others. Therefore, the second experiment was conducted to compare free urea (U) as control and three proportions (1%, 1.5%, and 2% of total dry matter) of MUO in the diet of sheep. Twenty-four non-castrated male Santa Ines lambs, with an average body weight of 22 ± 3.0 kg, were used and distributed in a completely randomized design with four treatments and six replications. The inclusion of 1% alginate-encapsulated urea (MUO1%) resulted in higher dry matter (DM) intake than free urea (p ≤ 0.05). MUO

Indexed as

DigestionUreaAlginatesAnimal FeedAnimalsDietMaleNitrogenRumenSheepSulfurAlginatesNitrogenSulfurUreaAlginateNH3-NNon-protein nitrogenSheepUrea

Identifiers

PMID37996715
OpenAlexW4388936771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.