Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996706›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2023

Ethics and regulation of neuronal optogenetics in the European Union.

Timo Faltus, Johannes Freise, Carsten Fluck, Hans Zillmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Optogenetics meets physiology.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timo FaltusLaw School, Faculty of Law, Economics and Business, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6003-5024
Johannes FreiseLaw School, Faculty of Law, Economics and Business, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-9218-7372
Carsten FluckLaw School, Faculty of Law, Economics and Business, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-6895-7075
Hans ZillmannLaw School, Faculty of Law, Economics and Business, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany. hans.zillmann@phil.uni-halle.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2930-4131
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GP2212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal optogenetics is a technique to control the activity of neurons with light. This is achieved by artificial expression of light-sensitive ion channels in the target cells. By optogenetic methods, cells that are naturally light-insensitive can be made photosensitive and addressable by illumination and precisely controllable in time and space. So far, optogenetics has primarily been a basic research tool to better understand the brain. However, initial studies are already investigating the possibility of using optogenetics in humans for future therapeutic approaches for neuronal based diseases such as Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, or to promote stroke recovery. In addition, optogenetic methods have already been successfully applied to a human in an experimental setting. Neuronal optogenetics also raises ethical and legal issues, e.g., in relation to, animal experiments, and its application in humans. Additional ethical and legal questions may arise when optogenetic methods are investigated on cerebral organoids. Thus, for the successful translation of optogenetics from basic research to medical practice, the ethical and legal questions of this technology must also be answered, because open ethical and legal questions can hamper the translation. The paper provides an overview of the ethical and legal issues raised by neuronal optogenetics. In addition, considering the technical prerequisites for translation, the paper shows consistent approaches to address these open questions. The paper also aims to support the interdisciplinary dialogue between scientists and physicians on the one hand, and ethicists and lawyers on the other, to enable an interdisciplinary coordinated realization of neuronal optogenetics.

Indexed as

EpilepsyOptogeneticsAnimalsBrainEuropean UnionHumansNeuronsCerebral organoidsEthicsLawNeuronal optogeneticRegulationTranslation

Identifiers

PMID37996706
PMCPMC10730653
OpenAlexW4388976399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.