Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996705›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2024

Glyoxal acid-free (GAF) histological fixative is a suitable alternative to formalin: results from an open-label comparative non-inferiority study.

Ales Ryska, Anna Sapino, Stefania Landolfi, Irene Sansano Valero, Santiago Ramon Y Cajal, Pedro Oliveira, Paolo Detillo, Luca Lianas, Francesca Frexia, Pier Andrea Nicolosi and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. AnViruses · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ales RyskaThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University and Faculty Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Anna SapinoCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Stefania LandolfiPathology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Irene Sansano ValeroPathology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Santiago Ramon Y CajalPathology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro OliveiraDepartment of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Paolo DetilloADDAX Biosciences Srl., Turin, Italy.
Luca LianasData-Intensive Computing Division, Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia (CRS4), Pula, Italy.
Francesca FrexiaData-Intensive Computing Division, Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia (CRS4), Pula, Italy.
Pier Andrea Nicolosi1MED SA, Agno, Switzerland.
Tommaso Monti1MED SA, Agno, Switzerland.
Benedetta BussolatiDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Caterina MarchiòCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Gianni BussolatiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. gianni.bussolati@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2175-5069

Funding

Regione Piemonte POR FESR 2014-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formalin, an aqueous solution of formaldehyde, has been the gold standard for fixation of histological samples for over a century. Despite its considerable advantages, growing evidence points to objective toxicity, particularly highlighting its carcinogenicity and mutagenic effects. In 2016, the European Union proposed a ban, but a temporary permission was granted in consideration of its fundamental role in the medical-diagnostic field. In the present study, we tested an innovative fixative, glyoxal acid-free (GAF) (a glyoxal solution deprived of acids), which allows optimal tissue fixation at structural and molecular level combined with the absence of toxicity and carcinogenic activity. An open-label, non-inferiority, multicentric trial was performed comparing fixation of histological specimens with GAF fixative vs standard phosphate-buffered formalin (PBF), evaluating the morphological preservation and the diagnostic value with four binary score questions answered by both the central pathology reviewer and local center reviewers. The mean of total score in the GAF vs PBF fixative groups was 3.7 ± 0.5 vs 3.9 ± 0.3 for the central reviewer and 3.8 ± 0.5 vs 4.0 ± 0.1 for the local pathologist reviewers, respectively. In terms of median value, similar results were observed between the two fixative groups, with a median value of 4.0. Data collected indicate the non-inferiority of GAF as compared to PBF for all organs tested. The present clinical performance study, performed following the international standard for performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices, highlights the capability of GAF to ensure both structural preservation and diagnostic value of the preparations.

Indexed as

FixativesFormaldehydeGlyoxalTissue FixationFemaleHumansMaleFixativesFormaldehydeGlyoxalFixationFormalinGlyoxal acid-free (GAF), Trial

Identifiers

PMID37996705
PMCPMC11329524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.