Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996632›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2024

A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Health Education Programs for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Rural Communities: Implications for Promoting Health Equity.

Ariel Washington, Lisa Smith, Georgia Anderson, Jill Randall, Karen Kayser, Scott LaJoie

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Practice Guideline on Effective Teaching Strategies and Methods for Cancer Patient Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Systematic Review on the Effective Teaching Strategies and Methods for Cancer Patient Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ariel WashingtonDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. awashington@wayne.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3586-1225
Lisa SmithGrace Abbott School of Social Work, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3638-7713
Georgia AndersonCollege of Allied Health Sciences, School of Social Work, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jill RandallSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Karen KayserKent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4384-4145
Scott LaJoieSchool of Public Health & Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
University of Louisville · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training Center in Cancer Care DeliveryT32CA236621 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lauren P Wallner · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA236621NCI NIH HHS T32-CA236621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rural women face an increased risk of cervical cancer diagnosis in comparison to women living in metropolitan areas. This review synthesized and critically evaluated cervical cancer screening interventions that target women living in rural communities in the USA. EBSCO, JSTOR, Medline, PsychINFO, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched using keywords related to cervical cancer screening, rural communities, and prevention interventions. Study eligibility included randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs, a psychosocial or educational intervention targeting cervical cancer prevention, and implementation in a rural setting. Eleven articles met criteria for the systematic review and 6 of those included information sufficient for meta-analysis. Cochrane guidelines, CONSORT-Equity 2017, and PROGRESS-Plus were used to assess included studies. The systematic review encompassed 9720 participants who were involved in a variety of intervention types: social media campaigns, faith-based, and patient navigation with lay health advisors. None of the studies met all criteria for the health equity assessment. The meta-analysis found that women in the intervention groups were more likely to participate in cervical cancer screening than women in control groups (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.49 to 3.97). The type of intervention mattered in increasing cervical cancer screening participation for women living in rural communities. Educational interventions in combination with patient navigation saw the most success in promoting cervical cancer screening. Further, health inequities focus is lacking robust consideration. Our results highlight a continued need to develop multicomponent interventions with a health equity focus to address barriers to screening and prevention.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth EducationHealth EquityRural PopulationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansCervical cancer preventionCervical cancer screeningHealth equityHealth promotion

Identifiers

PMID37996632
PMCPMC10994759
OpenAlexW4388961055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.