Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996523›Full record

ArticleScientific data2023

Fragment contribution models for predicting skin permeability using HuskinDB.

Laura J Waters, David J Cooke, Xin Ling Quah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura J WatersSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK. l.waters@hud.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9172-0828
David J CookeSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK.
Xin Ling QuahSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK.

Funding

University of Huddersfield UoHPhD2020LW
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models to predict skin permeation tend to be based on animal derived experimental data as well as knowing physicochemical properties of the compound under investigation, such as molecular volume, polarity and lipophilicity. This paper presents a strikingly contrasting model to predict permeability, formed entirely from simple chemical fragment (functional group) data and a recently released, freely accessible human (i.e. non-animal) skin permeation database, known as the 'Human Skin Database - HuskinDB'. Data from within the database allowed development of several fragment-based models, each including a calculable effect for all of the most commonly encountered functional groups present in compounds within the database. The developed models can be applied to predict human skin permeability (logK

Indexed as

SkinSkin AbsorptionAnimalsDatabases, FactualHumansModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalPermeability

Identifiers

PMID37996523
PMCPMC10667307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.