Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996439›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Computer-aided diagnosis of keratoconus through VAE-augmented images using deep learning.

Zhila Agharezaei, Reza Firouzi, Samira Hassanzadeh, Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati, Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy, Amin Golabpour, Reyhaneh Akbarzadeh, Laleh Agharezaei, Mohamad Amin Bakhshali, Mohammad Reza Sedaghat and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhila AgharezaeiPharmaceutical Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Reza FirouziDepartment of Computer Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Samira HassanzadehSchool of Paramedical Sciences and Rehabilitation, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Siamak Zarei-GhanavatiEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Kambiz BahaadinbeigyMedical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Future Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Amin GolabpourSchool of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Reyhaneh AkbarzadehDepartment of Optometry, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Laleh AgharezaeiModeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Future Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mohamad Amin BakhshaliDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Reza SedaghatEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Saeid EslamiPharmaceutical Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. s.eslami.h@gmail.com.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRKerman University of Medical Sciences · IRFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IRShahroud University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 981511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting clinical keratoconus (KCN) poses a challenging and time-consuming task. During the diagnostic process, ophthalmologists are required to review demographic and clinical ophthalmic examinations in order to make an accurate diagnosis. This study aims to develop and evaluate the accuracy of deep convolutional neural network (CNN) models for the detection of keratoconus (KCN) using corneal topographic maps. We retrospectively collected 1758 corneal images (978 normal and 780 keratoconus) from 1010 subjects of the KCN group with clinically evident keratoconus and the normal group with regular astigmatism. To expand the dataset, we developed a model using Variational Auto Encoder (VAE) to generate and augment images, resulting in a dataset of 4000 samples. Four deep learning models were used to extract and identify deep corneal features of original and synthesized images. We demonstrated that the utilization of synthesized images during training process increased classification performance. The overall average accuracy of the deep learning models ranged from 99% for VGG16 to 95% for EfficientNet-B0. All CNN models exhibited sensitivity and specificity above 0.94, with the VGG16 model achieving an AUC of 0.99. The customized CNN model achieved satisfactory results with an accuracy and AUC of 0.97 at a much faster processing speed compared to other models. In conclusion, the DL models showed high accuracy in screening for keratoconus based on corneal topography images. This is a development toward the potential clinical implementation of a more enhanced computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for KCN detection, which would aid ophthalmologists in validating the clinical decision and carrying out prompt and precise KCN treatment.

Indexed as

Deep LearningKeratoconusComputersHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37996439
PMCPMC10667539
OpenAlexW4388946203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.