Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996431›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Delay in diagnosis to treatment and impact on survival of gastric adenocarcinoma in a low income setting without screening facility.

D Subasinghe, P K B Mahesh, G K Wijesinghe, S Sivaganesh, A Samarasekera, M D S Lokuhetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D SubasingheDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, University Surgical Unit, The National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka. dumindas1982.hpb@gmail.com.
P K B MaheshPostgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
G K WijesingheDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
S SivaganeshDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, University Surgical Unit, The National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
A SamarasekeraDepartment of Pathology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
M D S LokuhettyDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment modality of gastric adenocarcinoma (GCA) depends on the stage of the disease at the clinical presentation. Long delays are probably an unfavorable factor for the patient's prognosis. A prospective longitudinal, study involving 145 consecutive GCA was conducted at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL). The overall delay (in weeks) was recorded for each patient and divided into four periods-patient, endoscopy, pathology and treatment. The median and Interquartile Range (IQR) duration of delays were calculated and differences were explored with chi square test and Mann Whitney U test Survival analysis was done with Kaplan Meier technique and Cox regression. The median duration of delays for patient, endoscopy, histology reporting delay, other histology delay (specimen transfer delay and report receipt delay) and treatment were 18 (IQR 14-27), 2 (IQR 2-3), 3 (IQR 2-3), 2 (IQR 1-2) and 6 (IQR 4-8) weeks respectively. Delayed patient presentation to hospital was associated with significant adverse median survival 16 (IQR 11.5-22.5) weeks versus 20 (IQR 16-27.5) weeks, p = 0.004. Delay in initiating treatment was associated with significantly lower median survival 04 (IQR 4-6) weeks versus 06 (IQR 4-8) weeks, p = 0.003. Over 60% of both proximal and distal GCA presented at an advanced radiological stage (stage III/IV). The Kaplan Meier analysis showed that the higher hazard function was associated with a higher tumour stage and undergoing chemotherapy. Age of the patient and the treatment modality were significant predictors of the survival. Patient delay and delay in initiation of definitive treatment are the most important factors that adversely affect the outcomes of GCA. Public health interventions aiming to shorten the patient delay time with proper referral for specialist care would play an important role. Also, it is important to minimize these preventable delays and there should be time limits in producing the histopathology report and to establish online portals of hospital and laboratory information systems for easy access of histology reports in future.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesSri LankaSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID37996431
PMCPMC10667260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.