Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37995859›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2024

Engineering therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Cosby A Stone, Benjamin W Spiller, Scott A Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Dual Blockade of LILRB1 and LILRB2 Enhances Antiviral Immune Responses in SIV Infection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cosby A StoneDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
Benjamin W SpillerDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn; Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
Scott A SmithDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn. Electronic address: scott.smith.1@vumc.org.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Comprehensive antigenic mapping of the human anti-peanut IgE antibody responseR01AI155668 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SCOTT ALAN · 2021 to 2025
$4.1M
Antigenic landscape of the human helminth IgE antibody responseR01AI130459 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SCOTT ALAN · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Molecular basis for anaphylaxis due to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal)R21AI154064 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SCOTT ALAN · 2020 to 2021
$427k
Generation and characterization of full-length naturally occurring allergen-specific human IgE mAbsR21AI123307 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SCOTT ALAN · 2017 to 2018
$408k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130459NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI155668NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI123307NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI154064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of human antibodies as biologic therapeutics has revolutionized patient care throughout fields of medicine. As our understanding of the many roles antibodies play within our natural immune responses continues to advance, so will the number of therapeutic indications for which an mAb will be developed. The great breadth of function, long half-life, and modular structure allow for nearly limitless therapeutic possibilities. Human antibodies can be rationally engineered to enhance their desired immune functions and eliminate those that may result in unwanted effects. Antibody therapeutics now often start with fully human variable regions, either acquired from genetically engineered humanized mice or from the actual human B cells. These variable genes can be further engineered by widely used methods for optimization of their specificity through affinity maturation, random mutagenesis, targeted mutagenesis, and use of in silico approaches. Antibody isotype selection and deliberate mutations are also used to improve efficacy and tolerability by purposeful fine-tuning of their immune effector functions. Finally, improvements directed at binding to the neonatal Fc receptor can endow therapeutic antibodies with unbelievable extensions in their circulating half-life. The future of engineered antibody therapeutics is bright, with the global mAb market projected to exhibit compound annual growth, forecasted to reach a revenue of nearly half a trillion dollars in 2030.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalProtein EngineeringAnimalsHumansMiceAntibodies, MonoclonalAllergyantibody engineeringIgEimmunologymAbtherapeutic antibody

Identifiers

PMID37995859
PMCPMC11437839
OpenAlexW4388871855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.