ReviewNuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine2023
Artificial Intelligence-powered automatic volume calculation in medical images - available tools, performance and challenges for nuclear medicine.
Review in Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- AFFUNet: adaptive feature fusion Transformer U-Net with joint loss function for medical image segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Prediction model for hypertrophied liver volume followed by hemihepatectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Article
- Influence of subgroup, location, and tumor volume in medulloblastoma surgery and consideration for second look surgery: a single institution experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Q.Liver software for the planning of treatment of liver cancer via transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 resin microspheres based on single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Cross-institutional automated multilabel segmentation for acute intracerebral hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, and perihematomal edema on CT.Radiology advances · 2025Article
- Guardians of precision: advancing radiation protection, safety, and quality systems in nuclear medicine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Volumetry is crucial in oncology and endocrinology, for diagnosis, treatment planning, and evaluating response to therapy for several diseases. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Deep Learning (DL) has significantly accelerated the automatization of volumetric calculations, enhancing accuracy and reducing variability and labor. In this review, we show that a high correlation has been observed between Machine Learning (ML) methods and expert assessments in tumor volumetry; Yet, it is recognized as more challenging than organ volumetry. Liver volumetry has shown progression in accuracy with a decrease in error. If a relative error below 10 % is acceptable, ML-based liver volumetry can be considered reliable for standardized imaging protocols if used in patients without major anomalies. Similarly, ML-supported automatic kidney volumetry has also shown consistency and reliability in volumetric calculations. In contrast, AI-supported thyroid volumetry has not been extensively developed, despite initial works in 3D ultrasound showing promising results in terms of accuracy and reproducibility. Despite the advancements presented in the reviewed literature, the lack of standardization limits the generalizability of ML methods across diverse scenarios. The domain gap, i. e., the difference in probability distribution of training and inference data, is of paramount importance before clinical deployment of AI, to maintain accuracy and reliability in patient care. The increasing availability of improved segmentation tools is expected to further incorporate AI methods into routine workflows where volumetry will play a more prominent role in radionuclide therapy planning and quantitative follow-up of disease evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.