Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37995706›Full record

ReviewNuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine2023

Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning for Advancing PET Image Reconstruction: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions.

Dirk Hellwig, Nils Constantin Hellwig, Steven Boehner, Timo Fuchs, Regina Fischer, Daniel Schmidt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Reengineered Anti-CD4 Cys-diabody Variants forMolecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dirk HellwigDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3056-0143
Nils Constantin HellwigDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Steven BoehnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Timo FuchsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Regina FischerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Daniel SchmidtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8767-3723

Funding

Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF) ZB-001Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung ABIDE_MI: 01ZZ2061T, DIFUTURE: 01ZZ1804H, NUM: 01KX2121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is vital for diagnosing diseases and monitoring treatments. Conventional image reconstruction (IR) techniques like filtered backprojection and iterative algorithms are powerful but face limitations. PET IR can be seen as an image-to-image translation. Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) using multilayer neural networks enable a new approach to this computer vision task. This review aims to provide mutual understanding for nuclear medicine professionals and AI researchers. We outline fundamentals of PET imaging as well as state-of-the-art in AI-based PET IR with its typical algorithms and DL architectures. Advances improve resolution and contrast recovery, reduce noise, and remove artifacts via inferred attenuation and scatter correction, sinogram inpainting, denoising, and super-resolution refinement. Kernel-priors support list-mode reconstruction, motion correction, and parametric imaging. Hybrid approaches combine AI with conventional IR. Challenges of AI-assisted PET IR include availability of training data, cross-scanner compatibility, and the risk of hallucinated lesions. The need for rigorous evaluations, including quantitative phantom validation and visual comparison of diagnostic accuracy against conventional IR, is highlighted along with regulatory issues. First approved AI-based applications are clinically available, and its impact is foreseeable. Emerging trends, such as the integration of multimodal imaging and the use of data from previous imaging visits, highlight future potentials. Continued collaborative research promises significant improvements in image quality, quantitative accuracy, and diagnostic performance, ultimately leading to the integration of AI-based IR into routine PET imaging protocols.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission Tomography

Identifiers

PMID37995706
PMCPMC10689088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.