Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37995370›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2023

Historic Museum Samples Provide Evidence for a Recent Replacement of Wolbachia Types in European Drosophila melanogaster.

Anton Strunov, Sandra Kirchner, Julia Schindelar, Luise Kruckenhauser, Elisabeth Haring, Martin Kapun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anton StrunovCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sandra KirchnerNatural History Museum Vienna, Central Research Laboratories, Vienna, Austria.
Julia SchindelarNatural History Museum Vienna, Central Research Laboratories, Vienna, Austria.
Luise KruckenhauserNatural History Museum Vienna, Central Research Laboratories, Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth HaringNatural History Museum Vienna, Central Research Laboratories, Vienna, Austria.
Martin KapunCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3810-0504
Natural History Museum Vienna · ATMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 32275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wolbachia is one of the most common bacterial endosymbionts, which is frequently found in numerous arthropods and nematode taxa. Wolbachia infections can have a strong influence on the evolutionary dynamics of their hosts since these bacteria are reproductive manipulators that affect the fitness and life history of their host species for their own benefit. Host-symbiont interactions with Wolbachia are perhaps best studied in the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, which is naturally infected with at least 5 different variants among which wMel and wMelCS are the most frequent ones. Comparisons of infection types between natural flies and long-term lab stocks have previously indicated that wMelCS represents the ancestral type, which was only very recently replaced by the nowadays dominant wMel in most natural populations. In this study, we took advantage of recently sequenced museum specimens of D. melanogaster that have been collected 90 to 200 yr ago in Northern Europe to test this hypothesis. Our comparison to contemporary Wolbachia samples provides compelling support for the replacement hypothesis. Our analyses show that sequencing data from historic museum specimens and their bycatch are an emerging and unprecedented resource to address fundamental questions about evolutionary dynamics in host-symbiont interactions. However, we also identified contamination with DNA from crickets that resulted in co-contamination with cricket-specific Wolbachia in several samples. These results underpin the need for rigorous quality assessments of museomic data sets to account for contamination as a source of error that may strongly influence biological interpretations if it remains undetected.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterWolbachiaAnimalsBiological EvolutionMuseumsReproductionSymbiosiscontaminationDrosophila melanogasterevolutionary historymuseomicsphylogenomicsWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID37995370
PMCPMC10701101
OpenAlexW4388928472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.