Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37995296›Full record

ArticleSurgical innovation2024

A Novel Surgical Technique for Gynecomastia: Air-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery With Single Axillary Incision.

Mustafa Tukenmez, Baran Mollavelioglu, Erol Kozanoglu, Selman Emiroglu, Neslihan Cabioglu, Mahmut Muslumanoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Using Ultrasound and Power-Assisted Devices through Lateral Incision: The OCCULT Technique for Gynecomastia-A Multicentric Large Series Study.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mustafa TukenmezDepartments of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Baran MollaveliogluDepartments of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Erol KozanogluPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Selman EmirogluDepartments of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Neslihan CabiogluDepartments of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mahmut MuslumanogluDepartments of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGynecomastia is a benign condition that develops due to the proliferation of breast tissue in men. Surgical excision is the most effective treatment method. Minimally invasive techniques can be used to avoid visible scarring. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of air-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy in the treatment of gynecomastia. PATIENT AND

methods10 patients with gynecomastia underwent air-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction through a single axillary incision, between June 2022 and February 2023. Demographic and clinical data of the patients, duration of surgery, and complications were recorded. The satisfaction levels of the patients regarding physical appearance, mental status, and social environment were measured. The body Q questionnaire was performed preoperatively and in the postoperative third month.

resultsThe median age was 26 (range, 18-54). Surgical excision was measured as a median of 69 gr (range, 41-177), and liposuction volume was measured as a median of 210 ccs (range, 63-400). The median operation time was 50 minutes (range, 21-60) for excision and 21 minutes (range, 20-75) for liposuction. Body, chest, and nipples related appearance satisfaction levels were measured preoperatively as a median of 44 (range, 36.5-52), 31 (range, 27.5-39), and 51.5 (range, 21-69.8) points vs postoperatively as 92 (range, 92-100), 93 (range, 93-94.8) and 90 (range, 90-100) points, respectively. The patients had a median follow-up of 6 months (range, 3-11). No complications were observed during the follow-up period.

conclusionAir-assisted subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction is a feasible technique that may provide good cosmetic outcomes by avoiding anterior chest wall scarring.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGynecomastiaLipectomyAdultCicatrixHumansMaleMastectomyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeair-assisted surgerybreast surgerygynecomastiaminimal invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID37995296
PMCPMC10773160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.