Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37995206›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)2024

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) for Brazilian Portuguese and evidence of its validity.

Franciele Cristiane Peloso, Murilo Ricardo Zibetti, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Ramiro Figueiredo Catelan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Franciele Cristiane PelosoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Universidade do Vale dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil.
Murilo Ricardo ZibettiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Universidade do Vale dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil.
Antonio Egidio NardiLaboratório de Pânico e Respiração, Instituto de Psiquiatria (IPUB), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ramiro Figueiredo CatelanLaboratório de Pânico e Respiração, Instituto de Psiquiatria (IPUB), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Centro de Pesquisa em Devaneio Excessivo e Desregulação Emocional, IPUB, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo adapt the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) for the Brazilian context and present evidence of validity based on its internal structure.

methodsA total of 2,682 Brazilian adults from different regions of the country took part in this study. Confirmatory factor analyses and multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) were performed to assess the factor structure of the MWQ. McDonald's omega (ω) was generated to provide reliability indexes.

resultsThe analyses demonstrated an adequate factor structure for the MWQ adapted to the Brazilian context, corroborating the original article's single-factor model and other adaptation studies. Furthermore, the results demonstrated the instrument's reliability in a Brazilian population (ω = 0.88).

conclusionThe MWQ is thus an adequate, reliable, and quickly administered instrument for those whose aim is to measure deliberate and spontaneous MW in Brazil.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonTranslationsAdolescentAdultAgedAttentionBrazilCultural CharacteristicsFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsAttentionmind-wanderingvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID37995206
PMCPMC11189109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.