Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37994788›Full record

Trial reportJournal of primary care & community health

Lung Cancer Screening Outreach Program in an Urban Native American Clinic.

Camille Robichaux, Madison Anderson, Rebecca Freese, Antony Stately, Abbie Begnaud

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Lung Cancer Screening Access and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Among American Indian and White Patients.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camille RobichauxDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0889-2114
Madison AndersonMinnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rebecca FreeseClinical and Translational Science Institute, Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Antony StatelyNative American Community Clinic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Abbie BegnaudDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · USNative American Health Center · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UM1TR004405 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Bruce R Blazar, Damien A Fair · 2023 to 2026
$30.8M
TRAINING-PULMONARY CELL &MOLECULAR BIOLOGY &PHYSIOLOGYT32HL007741 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI DUDLEY, R. ADAMS, INGBAR, DAVID H · 1994 to 2023
$13.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004405NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate uptake of lung cancer screening in an urban Native American clinic using 2 culturally targeted promotion strategies.

methodsPatients eligible for lung cancer screening from July 2019 to July 2021 were randomized to receive either a single culturally-targeted mailer from the clinic regarding possible eligibility for screening, or the same mailer plus a follow-up text message and additional mailing.

resultsOverall, there were low rates of shared decision-making visit scheduling (8.5%) with no difference between promotion strategy groups (9.4% in control group vs 7.7% in culturally-targeted outreach group). Only about 50% of the lung cancer screening CT exams ordered were completed and returned to the clinic.

conclusionsWhile there was no difference between arms in this intervention, 8.5% of the sample did complete a shared decision-making visit after these low-cost interventions. The gap between the number of screening CTs ordered and number who completed the CT represents an area where further interventions should focus.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeHumansMass Screeningcancer screeningcommunity healthhealth promotionlung cancerNative American health

Identifiers

PMID37994788
PMCPMC10668567
OpenAlexW4388952260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.