Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37994703›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2024

EMDB-the Electron Microscopy Data Bank.

wwPDB Consortium

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interactive segmentation of membrane and membrane-mimic densities in cryo-EM maps.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Measurement of atomic scattering factors by cryoelectron microscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

wwPDB Consortium

Funding

PDB MANAGEMENT BY THE RESEARCH COLLABORATORY FOR STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICSR01GM133198 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI BURLEY, STEPHEN K · 2019 to 2023
$19.3M
Unified Data Resource for Large Complexes Determined by Cryo-Electron MicroscopyR01GM079429 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHIU, WAH · 2007 to 2021
$11.6M
The BMRB as an evolving resource for biomolecular structure-function researchR01GM109046 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HOCH, JEFFREY C · 2014 to 2022
$6.6M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P025846/1Medical Research Council MR/P019544/1NCI NIH HHSNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079429NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109046NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM133198NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM133198NIH HHS R01GM109046Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212977/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) is the global public archive of three-dimensional electron microscopy (3DEM) maps of biological specimens derived from transmission electron microscopy experiments. As of 2021, EMDB is managed by the Worldwide Protein Data Bank consortium (wwPDB; wwpdb.org) as a wwPDB Core Archive, and the EMDB team is a core member of the consortium. Today, EMDB houses over 30 000 entries with maps containing macromolecules, complexes, viruses, organelles and cells. Herein, we provide an overview of the rapidly growing EMDB archive, including its current holdings, recent updates, and future plans.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualMicroscopy, ElectronInternetMacromolecular SubstancesMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID37994703
PMCPMC10767987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.