ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2023
Development and Finite Element (FE) analysis of a novel short hip stem concept.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In order to improve the anchorage behavior of short hip stems, this development project aims at designing a short hip stem concept that preserves the femoral neck and minimizes interference with the physiological stress distribution of the femur. The new design will be evaluated according to ISO 7206-4 which is the standard for testing Implants for surgery. Methods: Basic CAD models based on an established short stem prosthesis were created and evaluated using finite element analysis. The best design was further developed to achieve a more deformable stem while maintaining stability. The model was validated through Results: The "H-Beam" short stem showed a higher degree of deformation of approximately 142-144% compared to the established short stem. The FE model had a relative error of 0.98% and 1.07% compared to the Discussion: The FE model is deemed valid due to small differences in comparison to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.