Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37994358›Full record

ArticleComputer methods in applied mechanics and engineering2022

Data-driven Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Human Head Models.

Kshitiz Upadhyay, Dimitris G Giovanis, Ahmed Alshareef, Andrew K Knutsen, Curtis L Johnson, Aaron Carass, Philip V Bayly, Michael D Shields, K T Ramesh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kshitiz UpadhyayHopkins Extreme Materials Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Dimitris G GiovanisDepartment of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Ahmed AlshareefDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Andrew K KnutsenCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Curtis L JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Aaron CarassDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Philip V BaylyMechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Michael D ShieldsDepartment of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
K T RameshHopkins Extreme Materials Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USUniversity of Delaware · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

MRI Measurement of the Mechanical Vulnerability of the BrainU01NS112120 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS112120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models of the human head are promising tools for estimating the impact-induced response of the brain, and thus play an important role in the prediction of traumatic brain injury. The basic constituents of these models (i.e., model geometry, material properties, and boundary conditions) are often associated with significant uncertainty and variability. As a result, uncertainty quantification (UQ), which involves quantification of the effect of this uncertainty and variability on the simulated response, becomes critical to ensure reliability of model predictions. Modern biofidelic head model simulations are associated with very high computational cost and high-dimensional inputs and outputs, which limits the applicability of traditional UQ methods on these systems. In this study, a two-stage, data-driven manifold learning-based framework is proposed for UQ of computational head models. This framework is demonstrated on a 2D subject-specific head model, where the goal is to quantify uncertainty in the simulated strain fields (i.e., output), given variability in the material properties of different brain substructures (i.e., input). In the first stage, a data-driven method based on multi-dimensional Gaussian kernel-density estimation and diffusion maps is used to generate realizations of the input random vector directly from the available data. Computational simulations of a small number of realizations provide input-output pairs for training data-driven surrogate models in the second stage. The surrogate models employ nonlinear dimensionality reduction using Grassmannian diffusion maps, Gaussian process regression to create a low-cost mapping between the input random vector and the reduced solution space, and geometric harmonics models for mapping between the reduced space and the Grassmann manifold. It is demonstrated that the surrogate models provide highly accurate approximations of the computational model while significantly reducing the computational cost. Monte Carlo simulations of the surrogate models are used for uncertainty propagation. UQ of the strain fields highlights significant spatial variation in model uncertainty, and reveals key differences in uncertainty among commonly used strain-based brain injury predictor variables.

Indexed as

Gaussian process regressionGrassmannian diffusion mapsHead injury modelSurrogate modelTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI)Uncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID37994358
PMCPMC10664838
OpenAlexW3208657742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.