ReviewCurrent urology2023
Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab as monotherapies and combination treatment in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A narrative review.
Review in Current urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eosinophil Proportion May Serve as a Candidate Biomarker for Adverse Events in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Enfortumab Vedotin.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Tertiary lymphoid structures in urothelial carcinoma: bridging spatial architecture with therapeutic vulnerability in the post-BCG era.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Research advances in extracellular vesicles for diagnosis and treatment of genitourinary cancers.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Comparison of Current Immunotherapy Approaches and Novel Anti-Cancer Vaccine Modalities for Clinical Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cost-Effectiveness of Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab for First-Line Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in the United States.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025Article
- A case of remarkable response to combined radiation therapy, enfortumab vedotin, and pembrolizumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.International cancer conference journal · 2025Article
- Antibody-drug conjugate combinations in cancer treatment: clinical efficacy and clinical study perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- A bibliometric insight into neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer: trends, collaborations, and future avenues.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder cancer is the 10th most common cancer globally. The majority of bladder cancers are urothelial carcinomas (UCs), which, if locally advanced or metastatic, carry poor long-term prognosis. Cancer cells can evade the immune system by expressing the programmed cell death ligand 1 protein (PD-L1). Programmed cell death ligand 1 protein binds to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T cells, inhibiting their antitumor action. Bladder tumor cells also overexpress nectin-4, a cell adhesion polypeptide that contributes to metastasis, worsening prognosis. Current platinum-based chemotherapy treatments are suboptimal. This review aimed to assess novel treatments for locally advanced or metastatic UC that specifically target PD-L1 or nectin-4, namely, the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab and the anti-nectin-4 antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin (EV). Materials and methods: Relevant English-language peer-reviewed articles and conference abstracts from the last 5 years were identified through MEDLINE and EMBASE database searches. A narrative review was performed, with key results outlined below. Results: Pembrolizumab was demonstrated to be superior to chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for platinum-unresponsive participants in the KEYNOTE-045 trial, resulting in its Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Enfortumab vedotin therapy resulted in superior outcomes compared with chemotherapy in the EV-301 trial, resulting in FDA approval for its use for patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who had previously undergone treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Positive preliminary results for pembrolizumab and EV combination therapy have led to FDA approval in patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who are not eligible for platinum chemotherapy. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab and EV represent novel treatment options for patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented superior outcomes and tolerability as compared with standard chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.