Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37994168›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2025

Comparative population genomics of manta rays has global implications for management.

Emily Humble, Jane Hosegood, Gary Carvalho, Mark de Bruyn, Simon Creer, Guy M W Stevens, Amelia Armstrong, Ramon Bonfil, Mark Deakos, Daniel Fernando and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Emily HumbleRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and the Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-1269
Jane HosegoodThe Manta Trust, Catemwood House, Dorset, UK.
Gary CarvalhoMolecular Ecology and Evolution Group, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Mark de BruynMolecular Ecology and Evolution Group, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1528-9604
Simon CreerMolecular Ecology and Evolution Group, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Guy M W StevensThe Manta Trust, Catemwood House, Dorset, UK.
Amelia ArmstrongSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Ramon BonfilOcéanos Vivientes AC, Mexico City, Mexico.
Mark DeakosHawai'i Association for Marine Education and Research, Lahaina, USA.
Daniel FernandoThe Manta Trust, Catemwood House, Dorset, UK.
Niv FromanThe Manta Trust, Catemwood House, Dorset, UK.
Lauren R PeelThe Manta Trust, Catemwood House, Dorset, UK.
Stephen PollettThe Manta Trust, Catemwood House, Dorset, UK.
Alessandro PonzoLarge Marine Vertebrates Research Institute Philippines, Jagna, Philippines.
Joshua D StewartThe Manta Trust, Catemwood House, Dorset, UK.
Sabine WintnerKwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board, Umhlanga Rocks, South Africa.
Rob OgdenRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and the Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding population connectivity and genetic diversity is of fundamental importance to conservation. However, in globally threatened marine megafauna, challenges remain due to their elusive nature and wide-ranging distributions. As overexploitation continues to threaten biodiversity across the globe, such knowledge gaps compromise both the suitability and effectiveness of management actions. Here, we use a comparative framework to investigate genetic differentiation and diversity of manta rays, one of the most iconic yet vulnerable groups of elasmobranchs on the planet. Despite their recent divergence, we show how oceanic manta rays (Mobula birostris) display significantly higher heterozygosity than reef manta rays (Mobula alfredi) and that M. birostris populations display higher connectivity worldwide. Through inferring modes of colonization, we reveal how both contemporary and historical forces have likely influenced these patterns, with important implications for population management. Our findings highlight the potential for fisheries to disrupt population dynamics at both local and global scales and therefore have direct relevance for international conservation of marine species.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGenetics, PopulationSkates, FishAnimalsBiodiversityFisheriesGenetic VariationGenomicsMicrosatellite RepeatsPopulation Dynamicsconservation genomicsddRADfisheries managementgenetic diversitypopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID37994168
PMCPMC11789554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.