Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37994023›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2023

Context-Dependent Significance of London Dispersion.

Louis-Albin Gravillier, Scott L Cockroft

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louis-Albin GravillierEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Joseph Black Building, David Brewster Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, U.K.
Scott L CockroftEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Joseph Black Building, David Brewster Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-9321-8997
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ConspectusLondon forces constitute an attractive component of van der Waals interactions and originate from transient correlated momentary dipoles in adjacent atoms. The in-depth investigation of London dispersion forces poses notable challenges, especially in solution, owing to their inherently weak and competing character. Our objective in this Account is to shed light on the context-dependent significance of London dispersion forces by contrasting our own experimental findings with those from other research endeavors. Specifically, we will explore how factors such as the choice of system and solvent can influence the apparent role of London dispersion forces in molecular recognition processes. We initiate our Account by scrutinizing the Wilcox balance, which has yielded diverse and occasionally contradictory results. Following that, we provide an overview of the role of London dispersion forces and their context-dependent variations, encompassing alkyl-alkyl, halogen-π, alkyl-π, and aromatic stacking interactions.Several experimental investigations have revealed how difficult it is to measure the significance of London dispersion in solution. Indeed, dispersion forces seldom act as the exclusive driving force in molecular recognition processes, and solvation energetics also strongly influence equilibria and kinetics. Molecular balances that bring apolar functional groups into contact have proven to be instrumental in the experimental measurement of dispersion. The intramolecular approach avoids the need to pay the entropic cost of bringing interacting groups into contact, while also enabling solvent screening. Such experimental studies have found dispersion interactions between functional groups to be very weak (<5 kJ mol

Identifiers

PMID37994023
PMCPMC10702350
OpenAlexW4388928614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.