Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37993999›Full record

ArticleThe Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association2025

Interrater Reliability for Classifying Craniofacial Microsomia Severity: A Call for Objective Evaluation.

Elsa M Ronde, Jitske W Nolte, Alfred G Becking, Corstiaan C Breugem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unilateral Craniofacial Microsomia with Severe Tessier No. 7 Cleft and Mandibular Agenesis: A Rare Case Report.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elsa M RondeDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4526-351X
Jitske W NolteDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1570-6263
Alfred G BeckingDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Corstiaan C BreugemDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3587-7489

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveThe severity of craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is generally classified using the Orbit, Mandible, Ear, Soft tissue, Nerve (OMENS) classification score. The global assessment of the Phenotypic Assessment Tool for Craniofacial Microsomia (PAT-CFM), is a pictorial modification of the OMENS classification. The aim of this study was to assess the interrater reliability of the PAT-CFM global assessment score.DesignIn this prospective cohort study, three clinicians completed the global assessment form of the PAT-CFM. The mandible was classified based on orthopantomogram- and/or computed tomography images.ParticipantsConsecutive patients with CFM or microtia.

Indexed as

Goldenhar SyndromeAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleObserver VariationProspective StudiesRadiography, PanoramicReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexTomography, X-Ray Computedfacial morphologyhemifacial microsomiaimagingOMENSPAT-CFM‌reliability‌severity classification

Identifiers

PMID37993999
PMCPMC12075885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.