ArticleGenes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society2023
Detection of in vivo mutagenicity in rat liver samples using error-corrected sequencing techniques.
Article in Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complex versus simpleScience advances · 2026Article
- Assessment of mutagenic potential of puberulic acid contaminated in red yeast rice (beni-koji) health food supplements.Mutagenesis · 2026Article
- Potential for Computational Genotoxicity: A Report on Symposium 3 of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen and Genome Society (JEMS), 2024.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2026Article
- Application of error-corrected sequencing technologies for in vivo regulatory mutagenicity assessment.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2026Review
- Guidelines for the assessment and control of mutagenic impurities in pharmaceuticals.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2025Review
- Error-corrected next-generation sequencing mutagenicity assays in human HepaRG cells as human-relevant genetic toxicology new approach methodology.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMutagenicity, the ability of chemical agents to cause mutations and potentially lead to cancer, is a critical aspect of substance safety assessment for protecting human health and the environment. Metabolic enzymes activate multiple mutagens in living organisms, thus in vivo animal models provide highly important information for evaluating mutagenicity in human. Rats are considered suitable models as they share a similar metabolic pathway with humans for processing toxic chemical and exhibit higher responsiveness to chemical carcinogens than mice. To assess mutagenicity in rats, transgenic rodents (TGRs) are widely used for in vivo gene mutation assays. However, such assays are labor-intensive and could only detect transgene mutations inserted into the genome. Therefore, introducing a technology to directly detect in vivo mutagenicity in rats would be necessary. The next-generation sequencing (NGS) based error-corrected sequencing technique is a promising approach for such purposes.
resultsWe investigated the applicability of paired-end and complementary consensus sequencing (PECC-Seq), an error-corrected sequencing technique, for detecting in vivo mutagenicity in the rat liver samples. PECC-Seq allows for the direct detection of ultra-rare somatic mutations in the genomic DNA without being constrained by the genomic locus, tissue, or organism. We tested PECC-Seq feasibility in rats treated with diethylnitrosamine (DEN), a mutagenic compound. Interestingly, the mutation and mutant frequencies between PECC-Seq and the TGR assay displayed a promising correlation. Our results also demonstrated that PECC-Seq could successfully detect the A:T > T:A mutation in rat liver samples, consistent with the TGR assay. Furthermore, we calculated the trinucleotide mutation frequency and proved that PECC-Seq accurately identified the DEN treatment-induced mutational signatures.
conclusionsOur study provides the first evidence of using PECC-Seq for in vivo mutagenicity detection in rat liver samples. This approach could provide a valuable alternative to conventional TGR assays as it is labor- and time-efficient and eliminates the need for transgenic rodents. Error-corrected sequencing techniques, such as PECC-Seq, represent promising approaches for enhancing mutagenicity assessment and advancing regulatory science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.