Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37993952›Full record

ArticleGenes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society2023

Detection of in vivo mutagenicity in rat liver samples using error-corrected sequencing techniques.

Kazuki Izawa, Masataka Tsuda, Takayoshi Suzuki, Masamitsu Honma, Kei-Ichi Sugiyama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Complex versus simpleScience advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Guidelines for the assessment and control of mutagenic impurities in pharmaceuticals.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazuki IzawaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-25-26, Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan. k_izawa@nihs.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2509-5563
Masataka TsudaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-25-26, Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan.
Takayoshi SuzukiDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-25-26, Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan.
Masamitsu HonmaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-25-26, Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan.
Kei-Ichi SugiyamaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-25-26, Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan.
National Institute of Health Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMutagenicity, the ability of chemical agents to cause mutations and potentially lead to cancer, is a critical aspect of substance safety assessment for protecting human health and the environment. Metabolic enzymes activate multiple mutagens in living organisms, thus in vivo animal models provide highly important information for evaluating mutagenicity in human. Rats are considered suitable models as they share a similar metabolic pathway with humans for processing toxic chemical and exhibit higher responsiveness to chemical carcinogens than mice. To assess mutagenicity in rats, transgenic rodents (TGRs) are widely used for in vivo gene mutation assays. However, such assays are labor-intensive and could only detect transgene mutations inserted into the genome. Therefore, introducing a technology to directly detect in vivo mutagenicity in rats would be necessary. The next-generation sequencing (NGS) based error-corrected sequencing technique is a promising approach for such purposes.

resultsWe investigated the applicability of paired-end and complementary consensus sequencing (PECC-Seq), an error-corrected sequencing technique, for detecting in vivo mutagenicity in the rat liver samples. PECC-Seq allows for the direct detection of ultra-rare somatic mutations in the genomic DNA without being constrained by the genomic locus, tissue, or organism. We tested PECC-Seq feasibility in rats treated with diethylnitrosamine (DEN), a mutagenic compound. Interestingly, the mutation and mutant frequencies between PECC-Seq and the TGR assay displayed a promising correlation. Our results also demonstrated that PECC-Seq could successfully detect the A:T > T:A mutation in rat liver samples, consistent with the TGR assay. Furthermore, we calculated the trinucleotide mutation frequency and proved that PECC-Seq accurately identified the DEN treatment-induced mutational signatures.

conclusionsOur study provides the first evidence of using PECC-Seq for in vivo mutagenicity detection in rat liver samples. This approach could provide a valuable alternative to conventional TGR assays as it is labor- and time-efficient and eliminates the need for transgenic rodents. Error-corrected sequencing techniques, such as PECC-Seq, represent promising approaches for enhancing mutagenicity assessment and advancing regulatory science.

Indexed as

Error-corrected sequencingIn vivo mutagenicityMutational signaturesNext-generation sequencingRat liver sample

Identifiers

PMID37993952
PMCPMC10664353
OpenAlexW4388904331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.