Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37993845›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2023

Application of CT and MRI images based on an artificial intelligence algorithm for predicting lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Cheng-Jie Liu, Lei Zhang, Yi Sun, Lei Geng, Rui Wang, Kai-Min Shi, Jin-Xin Wan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Deep learning-based breast MRI for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cheng-Jie LiuDepartment of Information Center, Lianyungang Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Lianyungang, 222000, JiangSu, China.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Information System, Lianyungang 149 Hospital, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Yi SunDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, 161 Xingfu Road, Haizhou District, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Lei GengDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, 161 Xingfu Road, Haizhou District, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Rui WangDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, 161 Xingfu Road, Haizhou District, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Kai-Min ShiDepartment of Information Center, Lianyungang Shuangcheng Information Technology Co., Ltd, Lianyungang, 222000, China.
Jin-Xin WanDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, 161 Xingfu Road, Haizhou District, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China. jjjjiiiinnnn_3054@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the accuracy and effect of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for predicting lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.

methodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for literature from inception to June 2023 using keywords that included 'artificial intelligence', 'CT,' 'MRI', 'breast cancer' and 'lymph nodes'. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were screened and their data were extracted for analysis. The main outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and area under the curve (AUC).

resultsA total of 16 studies were included in the final meta-analysis, covering 4,764 breast cancer patients. Among them, 11 studies used the manual algorithm MRI to calculate breast cancer risk, which had a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.90; p < 0.001; I

conclusionComputed tomography and MRI images based on an AI algorithm have good diagnostic accuracy in predicting lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients and have the potential for clinical application.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceBreast cancerCTLymph node MetastasisMRI

Identifiers

PMID37993845
PMCPMC10666295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.