Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37993707›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2024

Trail using ants follow idiosyncratic routes in complex landscapes.

Robert Barrie, Lars Haalck, Benjamin Risse, Thomas Nowotny, Paul Graham, Cornelia Buehlmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert BarrieSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK.
Lars HaalckInstitute for Geoinformatics and Institute for Computer Science, University of Münster, Heisenbergstraße 2, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Benjamin RisseInstitute for Geoinformatics and Institute for Computer Science, University of Münster, Heisenbergstraße 2, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Thomas NowotnySchool of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QJ, UK.
Paul GrahamSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK.
Cornelia BuehlmannSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK. cornelia.buehlmann@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6628-6900
University of Sussex · GBUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large volume of research on individually navigating ants has shown how path integration and visually guided navigation form a major part of the ant navigation toolkit for many species and are sufficient mechanisms for successful navigation. One of the behavioural markers of the interaction of these mechanisms is that experienced foragers develop idiosyncratic routes that require that individual ants have personal and unique visual memories that they use to guide habitual routes between the nest and feeding sites. The majority of ants, however, inhabit complex cluttered environments and social pheromone trails are often part of the collective recruitment, organisation and navigation of these foragers. We do not know how individual navigation interacts with collective behaviour along shared trails in complex natural environments. We thus asked here if wood ants that forage through densely cluttered woodlands where they travel along shared trails repeatedly follow the same routes or if they choose a spread of paths within the shared trail. We recorded three long homing trajectories of 20 individual wood ants in their natural woodland habitat. We found that wood ants follow idiosyncratic routes when navigating along shared trails through highly complex visual landscapes. This shows that ants rely on individual memories for habitual route guidance even in cluttered environments when chemical trail information is available. We argue that visual cues are likely to be the dominant sensory modality for the idiosyncratic routes. These experiments shed new light on how ants, or insects in general, navigate through complex multimodal environments.

Indexed as

AntsAnimalsCuesEnvironmentHoming BehaviorMemoryIdiosyncratic routesNavigationPheromone trailsVisual navigationWood ants

Identifiers

PMID37993707
PMCPMC10924020
OpenAlexW4388893355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.