Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37993687›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2023

Is there a significant difference in the oral microbiome in vapers vs non-vapers?

Yasmine Coll, Alan Geddes

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yasmine CollLocum OMFS Junior Clinical Fellow, NHS GGC, Glasgow, UK. Yasmine.coll@nhs.scot.
Alan GeddesOMFS SpR, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.
NHS Grampian · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

data sourcesThis study was a secondary data analysis of a parent study that was initially designed to assess saliva and exhaled breath for passive e-cigarette vapour exposure in children. The initial study collected patients using convenience sampling of the local community between July 2018 and February 2019 and ethical approval was obtained prior to commencing. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Eligibility criteria for the parent vapers in the original study included self-reported daily use of e-cigarettes in the presence of children via the use of a questionnaire. Microbiome data for a total of 36 adults were collected and analysed in this study (18 vapers and 18 non-vapers).

resultsVapers have a distinct oral microbiome compared with non-vapers. They tend to have a higher relative abundance of Veilonella, an opportunistic pathogen that can stimulate the growth of other opportunistic pathogens. This species has also been found in carious lesions compared with healthy tooth surface.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdultChildHumansResearch DesignSmokersSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37993687
OpenAlexW4388912664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.