Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37993680›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2024

Cefepime versus carbapenems for treatment of AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections.

Julia Herrmann, Anne-Valérie Burgener-Gasser, Daniel Goldenberger, Jan Roth, Maja Weisser, Pranita D Tamma, Sarah Tschudin-Sutter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cefepime susceptibility testing in AmpC-hyperproducing Enterobacter cloacae complex: limitations of routine methods and a pragmatic diagnostic approach.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Wild-Type AmpC Beta-Lactamase-ProducingDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia HerrmannDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3405-9486
Anne-Valérie Burgener-GasserDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8119-8703
Daniel GoldenbergerDivision of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3788-3818
Jan RothDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Maja WeisserDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0134-1929
Pranita D TammaDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4143-6324
Sarah Tschudin-SutterDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland. sarah.tschudin@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4875-5368
University of Basel · CHJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCefepime is recommended for treating infections caused by AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-PE), though supporting evidence is limited. Therefore, this study compared outcomes associated with cefepime versus carbapenem therapy for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by AmpC-PE after phenotypic exclusion of ESBL-co-producing isolates.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study compared definite cefepime versus carbapenem treatment for AmpC-PE BSI in hospitalized patients of the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, between 01/2015 and 07/2020. Primary outcomes included in-hospital death, renal impairment and neurologic adverse events; secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and recurrent infection.

resultsTwo hundred and seventy episodes of AmpC-PE BSI were included, 162, 77 and 31 were treated with a carbapenem, cefepime and other antibiotics, respectively. Patients treated with carbapenems were more likely to be transferred to the ICU on admission and more frequently had central venous catheter as a source of infection. In uni- and multivariable analyses, primary and secondary outcomes did not differ between the two treatment groups, except for more frequent occurrence of neurological adverse events among patients treated with carbapenems and shorter length of hospital stay among survivors treated with cefepime.

conclusionAfter excluding isolates with phenotypic ESBL-co-production, cefepime was not associated with adverse outcomes compared to carbapenems when used to treat BSIs caused by AmpC-PE. Our study provides evidence to support the use of cefepime as a safe treatment strategy for AmpC-PE BSI, particularly in clinically stable patients without initial renal impairment or increased susceptibility to neurological adverse events.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsGammaproteobacteriaSepsisAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCefepimeCephalosporinsHospital MortalityHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesAmpC beta-lactamasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCefepimeCephalosporinsAmpC beta-lactamaseBloodstream infectionCarbapenem-sparing regimenCefepimeEnterobacterales

Identifiers

PMID37993680
PMCPMC10821988
OpenAlexW4388923599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.