ArticleScientific reports2023
Robust in-vehicle respiratory rate detection using multimodal signal fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensing Technologies and Physiological Parameters for Real-Time Driver Drowsiness Detection: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Robust in-vehicle heartbeat detection using multimodal signal fusion.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous health monitoring in private spaces such as the car is not yet fully exploited to detect diseases in an early stage. Therefore, we develop a redundant health monitoring sensor system and signal fusion approaches to determine the respiratory rate during driving. To recognise the breathing movements, we use a piezoelectric sensor, two accelerometers attached to the seat and the seat belt, and a camera behind the windscreen. We record data from 15 subjects during three driving scenarios (15 min each) city, highway, and countryside. An additional chest belt provides the ground truth. We compare the four convolutional neural network (CNN)-based fusion approaches: early, sensor-based late, signal-based late, and hybrid fusion. We evaluate the performance of fusing for all four signals to determine the portion of driving time and the signal combination. The hybrid algorithm fusing all four signals is most effective in detecting respiratory rates in the city ([Formula: see text]), highway ([Formula: see text]), and countryside ([Formula: see text]). In summary, 60% of the total driving time can be used to measure the respiratory rate. The number of signals used in the multi-signal fusion improves reliability and enables continuous health monitoring in a driving vehicle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.