Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37993552›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Robust in-vehicle respiratory rate detection using multimodal signal fusion.

Joana M Warnecke, Joan Lasenby, Thomas M Deserno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joana M WarneckePeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany. joana.warnecke@plri.de.
Joan LasenbyDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK.
Thomas M DesernoPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany.

Funding

Lower Saxony "Vorab" of the Volkswagen Foundation and Center for Digital Innovations ZN3491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous health monitoring in private spaces such as the car is not yet fully exploited to detect diseases in an early stage. Therefore, we develop a redundant health monitoring sensor system and signal fusion approaches to determine the respiratory rate during driving. To recognise the breathing movements, we use a piezoelectric sensor, two accelerometers attached to the seat and the seat belt, and a camera behind the windscreen. We record data from 15 subjects during three driving scenarios (15 min each) city, highway, and countryside. An additional chest belt provides the ground truth. We compare the four convolutional neural network (CNN)-based fusion approaches: early, sensor-based late, signal-based late, and hybrid fusion. We evaluate the performance of fusing for all four signals to determine the portion of driving time and the signal combination. The hybrid algorithm fusing all four signals is most effective in detecting respiratory rates in the city ([Formula: see text]), highway ([Formula: see text]), and countryside ([Formula: see text]). In summary, 60% of the total driving time can be used to measure the respiratory rate. The number of signals used in the multi-signal fusion improves reliability and enables continuous health monitoring in a driving vehicle.

Indexed as

RespirationRespiratory RateAlgorithmsHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID37993552
PMCPMC10665475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.