Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37993550›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Utilizing 2D-region-based CNNs for automatic dendritic spine detection in 3D live cell imaging.

Fabian W Vogel, Sercan Alipek, Jens-Bastian Eppler, Pamela Osuna-Vargas, Jochen Triesch, Diane Bissen, Amparo Acker-Palmer, Simon Rumpel, Matthias Kaschube

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabian W VogelFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies and Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Ruth-Moufang-Straße 1, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sercan AlipekFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies and Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Ruth-Moufang-Straße 1, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jens-Bastian EpplerFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies and Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Ruth-Moufang-Straße 1, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Pamela Osuna-VargasFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies and Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Ruth-Moufang-Straße 1, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jochen TrieschFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies and Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Ruth-Moufang-Straße 1, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Diane BissenInstitute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 15, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Amparo Acker-PalmerInstitute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 15, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Simon RumpelInstitute of Physiology, FTN, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hanns-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 19, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Matthias KaschubeFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies and Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Ruth-Moufang-Straße 1, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. kaschube@fias.uni-frankfurt.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC 1080Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SPP 2041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic spines are considered a morphological proxy for excitatory synapses, rendering them a target of many different lines of research. Over recent years, it has become possible to simultaneously image large numbers of dendritic spines in 3D volumes of neural tissue. In contrast, currently no automated method for 3D spine detection exists that comes close to the detection performance reached by human experts. However, exploiting such datasets requires new tools for the fully automated detection and analysis of large numbers of spines. Here, we developed an efficient analysis pipeline to detect large numbers of dendritic spines in volumetric fluorescence imaging data acquired by two-photon imaging in vivo. The core of our pipeline is a deep convolutional neural network that was pretrained on a general-purpose image library and then optimized on the spine detection task. This transfer learning approach is data efficient while achieving a high detection precision. To train and validate the model we generated a labeled dataset using five human expert annotators to account for the variability in human spine detection. The pipeline enables fully automated dendritic spine detection reaching a performance slightly below that of the human experts. Our method for spine detection is fast, accurate and robust, and thus well suited for large-scale datasets with thousands of spines. The code is easily applicable to new datasets, achieving high detection performance, even without any retraining or adjustment of model parameters.

Indexed as

Dendritic SpinesNerve TissueHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopy, ConfocalNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID37993550
PMCPMC10665560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.