Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37993387›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2023

The efficacy of some probiotics and prebiotics on the prevalence of E. coli and the immune response of chickens.

Seham Abdel-Shafi, Mohamed E Abd El-Hack, Samy Amen, Anaam Helmi, Ayman A Swelum, Guillermo Tellez-Isaias, Gamal Enan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Seham Abdel-ShafiBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.
Mohamed E Abd El-HackPoultry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.
Samy AmenBacteriology Department, Animal Health Research, Zagazig, Egypt.
Anaam HelmiBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.
Ayman A SwelumDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: aswelum@ksu.edu.sa.
Guillermo Tellez-IsaiasDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Gamal EnanBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.
Zagazig University · EGKing Saud University · SAUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of probiotics and prebiotics in controlling Escherichia coli (E. coli) spp. isolated from chicken. A total of 230 birds representing 19 different commercial breeds were taken from various points. Birds were monitored for postmortem and clinical investigation. Aseptically collected liver samples, lungs, kidneys, hearts, and yolk sacs were then subjected to bacterial isolation and identification. E. coli were observed in 9 pooled samples from 120 examined with an incidence of 7.5%. Nine farms were E. coli-positive, with an incidence of farm infection of 47.3%. The 9 suspected isolates of E. coli were profiled by morphological and microbiological identification of the colony, motility, and gram reaction. The serogroup analysis showed 9 different E. coli for which 3 other groups were identified: 2 E. coli O78, 3 E. coli O111, and 4 untyped groups. Nine isolates of E. coli were subjected to PCR. Molecular detection of 9 strains was conducted to find the virulence genes of E. coli strains (8 STX1, 4 STX2, and 9 EAE). Probiotics and prebiotics significantly increased the total erythrocytic and leukocytic counts throughout the experiment. The phagocytic percentage's main values at 14 d were 47 and 30%, respectively. An increase in the humoral immunity against Newcastle disease (ND) was noticed after ND vaccination. The geometric mean (HI) was 5.9 and 4.2 for probiotic and prebiotic, respectively. It could be concluded that probiotics and prebiotics could stimulate a nonspecific immune response against experimental infection with a virulent strain of E. coli spp.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsProbioticsAnimalsChickensEscherichia coliImmunity, InnatePrebioticsPrevalencePrebioticsbroiler chickenEscherichia coliprebioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID37993387
PMCPMC10755822
OpenAlexW4387827225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.