Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37993169›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Feasibility interventional study investigating PAIN in neurorehabilitation through wearabLE SensorS (PAINLESS): a study protocol.

Serena Moscato, Silvia Orlandi, Francesco Di Gregorio, Giada Lullini, Stefania Pozzi, Loredana Sabattini, Lorenzo Chiari, Fabio La Porta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05747040 (Pain Assessment in Neurorehabilitation Through Physiological Signals Recorded by Wearable Devices in Real-world Context), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05747040 naunknown statusnot on this map

Pain Assessment in Neurorehabilitation Through Physiological Signals Recorded by Wearable Devices in Real-world Context: an Exploratory Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Usl di BolognaRan2023 to 2023Enrolled15ConditionsPain, Multiple SclerosisArmsmonitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Serena MoscatoDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" - DEI, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0538-650X
Silvia OrlandiDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" - DEI, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco Di GregorioUOC Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giada LulliniIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologuche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stefania PozziDATER Riabilitazione Ospedaliera, UA Riabilitazione, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Loredana SabattiniIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologuche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo ChiariDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" - DEI, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Fabio La PortaIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologuche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy fabiolaporta@mail.com.
Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITLaboratori Guglielmo Marconi (Italy) · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMillions of people survive injuries to the central or peripheral nervous system for which neurorehabilitation is required. In addition to the physical and cognitive impairments, many neurorehabilitation patients experience pain, often not widely recognised and inadequately treated. This is particularly true for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, for whom pain is one of the most common symptoms. In clinical practice, pain assessment is usually conducted based on a subjective estimate. This approach can lead to inaccurate evaluations due to the influence of numerous factors, including emotional or cognitive aspects. To date, no objective and simple to use clinical methods allow objective quantification of pain and the diagnostic differentiation between the two main types of pain (nociceptive vs neuropathic). Wearable technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to bridge this gap by continuously monitoring patients' health parameters and extracting meaningful information from them. Therefore, we propose to develop a new automatic AI-powered tool to assess pain and its characteristics during neurorehabilitation treatments using physiological signals collected by wearable sensors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We aim to recruit 15 participants suffering from MS undergoing physiotherapy treatment. During the study, participants will wear a wristband for three consecutive days and be monitored before and after their physiotherapy sessions. Measurement of traditionally used pain assessment questionnaires and scales (ie, painDETECT, Doleur Neuropathique 4 Questions, EuroQoL-5-dimension-3-level) and physiological signals (photoplethysmography, electrodermal activity, skin temperature, accelerometer data) will be collected. Relevant parameters from physiological signals will be identified, and AI algorithms will be used to develop automatic classification methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the local Ethical Committee (285-2022-SPER-AUSLBO). Participants are required to provide written informed consent. The results will be disseminated through contributions to international conferences and scientific journals, and they will also be included in a doctoral dissertation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05747040.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeurological RehabilitationFeasibility StudiesHumansPainPhysical Therapy ModalitiesMultiple sclerosisNeurological painPAIN MANAGEMENTREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID37993169
PMCPMC10668325
OpenAlexW4388895796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.