ArticleGenome research2023
Integrating SNVs and CNAs on a phylogenetic tree from single-cell DNA sequencing data.
Article in Genome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The glioblastoma ecosystem: clonal evolution, heterogeneity, and therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Sc-TUSV-Ext: Single-Cell Clonal Lineage Inference from Single Nucleotide Variants, Copy Number Alterations, and Structural Variants.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2025Article
- DICE: fast and accurate distance-based reconstruction of single-cell copy number phylogenies.Life science alliance · 2025Article
- SCGclust: Single Cell Graph clustering using graph autoencoders integrating SNVs and CNAs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Cancer phylogenetic inference using copy number alterations detected from DNA sequencing data.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell DNA sequencing enables the construction of evolutionary trees that can reveal how tumors gain mutations and grow. Different whole-genome amplification procedures render genomic materials of different characteristics, often suitable for the detection of either single-nucleotide variation or copy number aberration, but not ideally for both. Consequently, this hinders the inference of a comprehensive phylogenetic tree and limits opportunities to investigate the interplay of SNVs and CNAs. Existing methods such as SCARLET and COMPASS require that the SNVs and CNAs are detected from the same sets of cells, which is technically challenging. Here we present a novel computational tool, SCsnvcna, that places SNVs on a tree inferred from CNA signals, whereas the sets of cells rendering the SNVs and CNAs are independent, offering a more practical solution in terms of the technical challenges. SCsnvcna is a Bayesian probabilistic model using both the genotype constraints on the tree and the cellular prevalence to search the optimal solution. Comprehensive simulations and comparison with seven state-of-the-art methods show that SCsnvcna is robust and accurate in a variety of circumstances. Particularly, SCsnvcna most frequently produces the lowest error rates, with ability to scale to a wide range of numerical values for leaf nodes in the tree, SNVs, and SNV cells. The application of SCsnvcna to two published colorectal cancer data sets shows highly consistent placement of SNV cells and SNVs with the original study while also supporting a refined placement of ATP7B, illustrating SCsnvcna's value in analyzing complex multitumor samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.