ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2024
On the loss of image contrast in double-inversion-recovery prepared T2* MRI of Intramyocardial hemorrhage.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- The value of double inversion recovery MRI sequences in the diagnosis of inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the spinal cord.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- The effect of head coil configuration and channel count on the quality of double inversion recovery (DIR) MRI images.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeStudies have shown that double-inversion-recovery (DIR) prepared dark-blood T2*-weighted images result in lower SNR, CNR and diagnostic accuracy for intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) detection compared to non-DIR-prepared (bright-blood) T2*-weighted images; however, the mechanism contributing to this observation has not been investigated and explained in detail. This work tests the hypothesis that the loss of SNR on dark-blood cardiac T2*-weighted images of IMH stems from spin-relaxation during the long RF pulses in double inversion preparation, as a result, compromising image contrast for intramyocardial hemorrhage detection.
methodsPhantom and in-vivo animal studies were performed to test the hypothesis of the study. An agar phantom was imaged with multi-gradient-echo T2* imaging protocols with and without double-inversion-recovery (DIR) preparation. Image acquisitions were placed at different delay times (TD) after DIR preparation. SNR, T2* and Coefficient of Variation (COV) were measured and compared between DIR-prepared and non-DIR-prepared images. Canines with hemorrhagic myocardial infarctions were scanned at 3.0 T with DIR-prepared (dark-blood) and non-DIR-prepared (bright-blood) T2* imaging protocols. DIR-prepared T2* images were acquired with short, medium, and long delay times (TD). SNR, CNR, intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) extent, T2* and COV were measured and compared between DIR-prepared T2* images with short, medium, and long delay times (TD) to non-DIR-prepared bright-blood T2* images.
resultsPhantom studies confirmed the hypothesis that the SNR loss on DIR-prepared T2* images originated from signal loss during DIR preparation. SNR followed T1 recovery curve with increased delay times (TD) indicating that SNR can be recovered with longer time delay between DIR and image acquisition. Myocardial T2* values were not affected by DIR preparation but COV of T2* was elevated. Animal studies supported the hypothesis and showed that DIR-prepared T2* images with insufficient delay time (TD) had impaired sensitivity for IMH detection due to lower SNR and CNR, and higher COV.
conclusionWe conclude that lower SNR and CNR on DIR-prepared T2* images originate from signal loss during DIR preparation and insufficient recovery between DIR preparation and image acquisition. Although, the impaired sensitivity can be recovered by extending delay time (TD), it will extend the scan time. Bright-blood T2* imaging protocols should remain the optimal choice for assessment of intramyocardial hemorrhage. DIR-prepared dark-blood T2* imaging protocols should be performed with extra attention on image signal-to-noise ratio when used for intramyocardial hemorrhage detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.