ReviewJournal of advanced research2024
A next-generation dynamic programming language Julia: Its features and applications in biological science.
Review in Journal of advanced research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speeding Up Hartree-Fock in JuliaChem with Density Fitting.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Identifying a novel Mecp2-mediated epigenetic mechanism controlling Lonp1 in the hippocampus and its disruption by aging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe advent of Julia as a sophisticated and dynamic programming language in 2012 represented a significant milestone in computational programming, mathematical analysis, and statistical modeling. Having reached its stable release in version 1.9.0 on May 7, 2023, Julia has developed into a powerful and versatile instrument. Despite its potential and widespread adoption across various scientific and technical domains, there exists a noticeable knowledge gap in comprehending its utilization within biological sciences. THE AIM OF REVIEW: This comprehensive review aims to address this particular knowledge gap and offer a thorough examination of Julia's fundamental characteristics and its applications in biology. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF THE REVIEW: The review focuses on a research gap in the biological science. The review aims to equip researchers with knowledge and tools to utilize Julia's capabilities in biological science effectively and to demonstrate the gap. It paves the way for innovative solutions and discoveries in this rapidly evolving field. It encompasses an analysis of Julia's characteristics, packages, and performance compared to the other programming languages in this field. The initial part of this review discusses the key features of Julia, such as its dynamic and interactive nature, fast processing speed, ease of expression manipulation, user-friendly syntax, code readability, strong support for multiple dispatch, and advanced type system. It also explores Julia's capabilities in data analysis, visualization, machine learning, and algorithms, making it suitable for scientific applications. The next section emphasizes the importance of using Julia in biological research, highlighting its seamless integration with biological studies for data analysis, and computational biology. It also compares Julia with other programming languages commonly used in biological research through benchmarking and performance analysis. Additionally, it provides insights into future directions and potential challenges in Julia's applications in biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.