Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37992271›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2023

Burden of AML, 1990-2019: Estimates From the Global Burden of Disease Study.

Chinmay T Jani, Alaaeldin Ahmed, Harpreet Singh, Christian Mouchati, Omar Al Omari, Padmanabh S Bhatt, Rajesh Sharma, Minaam Farooq, Weitao Liu, Joseph Shalhoub and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Chinmay T JaniSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Miami, Miami, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-6917-5568
Alaaeldin AhmedDepartment of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-3219-4810
Harpreet SinghM.D.R Collaborative Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8001-4191
Christian MouchatiM.D.R Collaborative Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3958-4125
Omar Al OmariDepartment of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-0789-3847
Padmanabh S BhattDepartment of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA.
Rajesh SharmaHumanities and Social Science, National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra, Haryana, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7468-1249
Minaam FarooqKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Weitao LiuDepartment of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0009-0006-9663-8958
Joseph ShalhoubM.D.R Collaborative Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1011-7440
Dominic MarshallM.D.R Collaborative Group, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3498-2511
Justin D SalciccioliDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-8092-0883
Jeremy L WarnerCenter for Clinical Cancer Informatics and Data Science, Legorreta Cancer Center, Brown University, Providence, RI.ORCID 0000-0002-2851-7242
Prudence LamDepartment of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA.
Mount Auburn Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · USImperial College London · GBKing Edward Medical University · PKMedical College of Wisconsin · USNational Institute of Technology Kurukshetra · INProvidence College · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAML accounts for 80% of acute leukemia in adults. While progress has been made in treating younger patients in the past 2 decades, there has been limited improvement for older patients until recently. This study examines the global and European Union (EU) 15+ trends in AML between 1990 and 2019.

methodsWe extracted age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs), age-standardized death rates (ASMRs), and disability-adjusted life years, stratified by sex from the Global Burden of Disease Study database, and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) were computed. Trends were compared using Joinpoint regression.

resultsThe findings show a global increase in AML incidence for both sexes from 1990 to 2019. In the EU15+ countries, most countries exhibited an increase in ASIR for both sexes. Joinpoint revealed that globally for male patients, ASIR steadily increased until 2010, remained stable until 2015 followed by a decline till 2019. Similar trends were observed in female patients. For ASMR, although there was an increase globally and in most EU15+ countries, there was a statistically significant decrease in mortality rates globally and in the majority of EU15+ countries in recent years. MIR improved in both sexes globally. On age stratification, AML burden was highest among older groups (55 years and older), while the lowest rates were observed in younger than 20 years.

conclusionThe findings from our study indicate a global rise in AML incidence and mortality in both sexes and decrease in MIR from 1990 to 2019 suggesting a better survival. However, on Joinpoint analysis, there is no change in MIR in women in the past decade and past 4 years in men indicating plateau in survival trends despite recent advances.

Indexed as

Global Burden of DiseaseAdultFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID37992271
PMCPMC10681472
OpenAlexW4388899117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.