Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37992046›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

Impact of a randomized controlled trial of discounts on fruits, vegetables, and noncaloric beverages in NYC supermarkets on food intake and health risk factors.

Aniema Nzesi, Benedicta Owusu, Jillian Barry, Manveer Sandhu, Allan Geliebter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04178824 (Multi-level Supermarket Discounts of Fruits and Vegetables' Impact on Intake and Health), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04178824 nacompletednot on this map

Multi-level Supermarket Discounts of Fruits and Vegetables' Impact on Intake and Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRan2016 to 2022Enrolled167ConditionsObesityArmsDiscount Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aniema NzesiDepartment of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Morningside, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6381-3314
Benedicta OwusuDepartment of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Morningside, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.
Jillian BarryDepartment of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Morningside, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0559-9580
Manveer SandhuDepartment of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Morningside, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.
Allan GeliebterDepartment of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Morningside, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

Multi-level supermarket discounts of fruits and vegetables on intake and healthR01DK105440 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI GELIEBTER, ALLAN · 2016 to 2021
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to observe the effects of a multi-level (30%, 15%, and 0%) randomized discount on fruits, vegetables, and non-caloric beverages on changes in dietary intake. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) comprised an 8-week baseline, a 32-week intervention, and a 16-week follow-up. 24-hour dietary recalls were conducted during the baseline period and before the intervention midpoint. In-person clinical measures were analyzed from Week 8 (end of baseline) and 24 (midpoint). This report is from an interim analysis up to the intervention period midpoint at Week 24, as the study is still ongoing. Participants with BMIs of 24.5-50 kg/m2 and ages 18-70 years old who were the primary household shoppers were recruited from several New York City supermarkets, starting in September 2018. Of these, we analyzed 20 in the 30% discount group, 25 in the 15% discount group, and 19 in the 0% discount group. The 30% discount group reported greater intake of vegetables (+98.4 g ± 48.9 SD, P = 0.049) and diet soda (+63.3 g ± 29.3, P = 0.035) relative to the baseline period, compared to the 0% discount group. The clinical measures including body weight remained unchanged. The participants who experienced the COVID-19 pandemic had a marginal increase in body weight of 1.5 kg, P = 0.053. In conclusion, we observed a significant increase in intake of vegetables and diet soda in the 30% discount group relative to the 0% discount group.

Indexed as

FruitVegetablesAdolescentAdultAgedBeveragesBody WeightDietEatingFood MarketsHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37992046
PMCPMC10664931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.