Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37991979›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2023

Extracting Clinical Information From Japanese Radiology Reports Using a 2-Stage Deep Learning Approach: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Kento Sugimoto, Shoya Wada, Shozo Konishi, Katsuki Okada, Shirou Manabe, Yasushi Matsumura, Toshihiro Takeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kento SugimotoDepartment of Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6874-2399
Shoya WadaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7055-1009
Shozo KonishiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6458-2685
Katsuki OkadaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-781X
Shirou ManabeDepartment of Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3083-5012
Yasushi MatsumuraDepartment of Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9379-3924
Toshihiro TakedaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3073-7823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiology reports are usually written in a free-text format, which makes it challenging to reuse the reports. Objective: For secondary use, we developed a 2-stage deep learning system for extracting clinical information and converting it into a structured format. Methods: Our system mainly consists of 2 deep learning modules: entity extraction and relation extraction. For each module, state-of-the-art deep learning models were applied. We trained and evaluated the models using 1040 in-house Japanese computed tomography (CT) reports annotated by medical experts. We also evaluated the performance of the entire pipeline of our system. In addition, the ratio of annotated entities in the reports was measured to validate the coverage of the clinical information with our information model. Results: The microaveraged F1-scores of our best-performing model for entity extraction and relation extraction were 96.1% and 97.4%, respectively. The microaveraged F1-score of the 2-stage system, which is a measure of the performance of the entire pipeline of our system, was 91.9%. Our system showed encouraging results for the conversion of free-text radiology reports into a structured format. The coverage of clinical information in the reports was 96.2% (6595/6853). Conclusions: Our 2-stage deep system can extract clinical information from chest and abdomen CT reports accurately and comprehensively.

Indexed as

deep learningfree textinformation extractionmachine learningnamed entity recognitionnatural language processingNLPradiologyradiology reportrelation extractionreportreportsunstructured

Identifiers

PMID37991979
PMCPMC10686535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.