ArticleJMIR medical informatics2023
Extracting Clinical Information From Japanese Radiology Reports Using a 2-Stage Deep Learning Approach: Algorithm Development and Validation.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A High-Accuracy Rule-Based Algorithm for Automated Extraction of Coronary Artery Calcium Scores from Mixed-Language Radiology Reports.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- ModernBERT is more efficient than conventional BERT for chest CT findings classification in Japanese radiology reports.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated Detection of Cancer-Suspicious Findings in Japanese Radiology Reports with Natural Language Processing: A Multicenter Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Two stage large language model approach enhancing entity classification and relationship mapping in radiology reports.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Performance Improvement of a Natural Language Processing Tool for Extracting Patient Narratives Related to Medical States From Japanese Pharmaceutical Care Records by Increasing the Amount of Training Data: Natural Language Processing Analysis and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Annotation-free multi-organ anomaly detection in abdominal CT using free-text radiology reports: a multi-centre retrospective study.EBioMedicine · 2024Article
- Year 2023 in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: a Tribute to Large Language Models and Generative AI.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Article
- Clinical applications of generative artificial intelligence in radiology: image translation, synthesis, and text generation.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Automated information extraction model enhancing traditional Chinese medicine RCT evidence extraction (Evi-BERT): algorithm development and validation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiology reports are usually written in a free-text format, which makes it challenging to reuse the reports. Objective: For secondary use, we developed a 2-stage deep learning system for extracting clinical information and converting it into a structured format. Methods: Our system mainly consists of 2 deep learning modules: entity extraction and relation extraction. For each module, state-of-the-art deep learning models were applied. We trained and evaluated the models using 1040 in-house Japanese computed tomography (CT) reports annotated by medical experts. We also evaluated the performance of the entire pipeline of our system. In addition, the ratio of annotated entities in the reports was measured to validate the coverage of the clinical information with our information model. Results: The microaveraged F1-scores of our best-performing model for entity extraction and relation extraction were 96.1% and 97.4%, respectively. The microaveraged F1-score of the 2-stage system, which is a measure of the performance of the entire pipeline of our system, was 91.9%. Our system showed encouraging results for the conversion of free-text radiology reports into a structured format. The coverage of clinical information in the reports was 96.2% (6595/6853). Conclusions: Our 2-stage deep system can extract clinical information from chest and abdomen CT reports accurately and comprehensively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.