Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37991852›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Joint analysis of multiple phenotypes for extremely unbalanced case-control association studies using multi-layer network.

Hongjing Xie, Xuewei Cao, Shuanglin Zhang, Qiuying Sha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongjing XieDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.
Xuewei CaoDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.
Shuanglin ZhangDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9478-1199
Qiuying ShaDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9342-3269

Funding

Portage Health Foundation Graduate Assistantship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGenome-wide association studies is an essential tool for analyzing associations between phenotypes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Most of binary phenotypes in large biobanks are extremely unbalanced, which leads to inflated type I error rates for many widely used association tests for joint analysis of multiple phenotypes. In this article, we first propose a novel method to construct a Multi-Layer Network (MLN) using individuals with at least one case status among all phenotypes. Then, we introduce a computationally efficient community detection method to group phenotypes into disjoint clusters based on the MLN. Finally, we propose a novel approach, MLN with Omnibus (MLN-O), to jointly analyse the association between phenotypes and a SNP. MLN-O uses the score test to test the association of each merged phenotype in a cluster and a SNP, then uses the Omnibus test to obtain an overall test statistic to test the association between all phenotypes and a SNP.

resultsWe conduct extensive simulation studies to reveal that the proposed approach can control type I error rates and is more powerful than some existing methods. Meanwhile, we apply the proposed method to a real data set in the UK Biobank. Using phenotypes in Chapter XIII (Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue) in the UK Biobank, we find that MLN-O identifies more significant SNPs than other methods we compare with. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/Hongjing-Xie/Multi-Layer-Network-with-Omnibus-MLN-O.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID37991852
PMCPMC10697735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.