SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2023
Guidelines, Consensus Statements, and Standards for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Governance in Health Systems: Systematic Review of Frameworks and Integrative Model Proposal.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- An explainable online frailty prediction model for community-dwelling older adults based on machine learning algorithms: a cross-sectional study based on retrospective health data.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- From Innovation to Impact: The CREATE Framework as a Blueprint for Large Language Model Adoption in Opioid Treatment Programs.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Transparency, accountability, and scholarly integrity: A systematic narrative review of artificial intelligence governance frameworks in healthcare publication.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Effects of Type and Timing of Clinician-Facing AI Support on Patient Trust in Medical Consultations: 2 Vignette Experiments.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Multidimensional manifestations of artificial intelligence literacy among clinical nurses: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Research Ethics Committees (RECs) perspectives on large language models and AI ethics review: a South African case.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Challenges for implementation of "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) protocols and artificial intelligence support tools in resource-limited countries.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
- Optimizing arthroplasty outcomes: the impact of artificial intelligence and robotic assistance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- A review of application of Artificial Intelligence in breast cancer detection and treatment.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- A pre-trained language model approach for triaging surgical patients for preoperative anesthesia clinics.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Ovarian tissue quality assessment and fertility preservation strategies enabled by multi-omics and artificial intelligence: current applications and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Article
- AI-driven multi-omics integration in breast cancer: clinical applications, immunotherapy prediction, and translational challenges.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery as Patient Safety Strategies for Perioperative Care in Resource-Limited Settings.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in screening and medical imaging of precancerous gastric diseases.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Understanding the evidence for artificial intelligence in healthcare.BMJ quality & safety · 2025Article
- eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation: an international consensus study.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Evidence-based general practice: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Guidelines and standard frameworks for artificial intelligence in medicine: a systematic review.JAMIA open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the delivery of health care is a promising area, and guidelines, consensus statements, and standards on AI regarding various topics have been developed.
objectiveWe performed this study to assess the quality of guidelines, consensus statements, and standards in the field of AI for medicine and to provide a foundation for recommendations about the future development of AI guidelines.
methodsWe searched 7 electronic databases from database establishment to April 6, 2022, and screened articles involving AI guidelines, consensus statements, and standards for eligibility. The AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II) and RIGHT (Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare) tools were used to assess the methodological and reporting quality of the included articles.
resultsThis systematic review included 19 guideline articles, 14 consensus statement articles, and 3 standard articles published between 2019 and 2022. Their content involved disease screening, diagnosis, and treatment; AI intervention trial reporting; AI imaging development and collaboration; AI data application; and AI ethics governance and applications. Our quality assessment revealed that the average overall AGREE II score was 4.0 (range 2.2-5.5; 7-point Likert scale) and the mean overall reporting rate of the RIGHT tool was 49.4% (range 25.7%-77.1%).
conclusionsThe results indicated important differences in the quality of different AI guidelines, consensus statements, and standards. We made recommendations for improving their methodological and reporting quality.
trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022321360); https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=321360.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.