ArticleJAMA network open2023
Rapid Access Addiction Medicine Clinics for People With Problematic Opioid Use.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collaborative care intervention for risky opioid use among primary care patients: The STOP randomized clinical trial.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Trial
- Equity-Related Determinants of Frequent Emergency Department Visits for Substance Use Disorders: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2026Article
- "With this you're not chained down to something": contrasting experiences of opioid agonist treatment and safer supply program participation among people receiving prescribed safer supply.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- Predicting drug overdose and death after "before medically advised" hospital discharge.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- Duration of Methadone and Buprenorphine-Naloxone Treatment.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Identifying opioid agonist treatment prescriber networks from health administrative data: A validation study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives on a Rapid Access, Walk-in, Medication for Addiction Treatment Clinic.Substance abuse and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing CareConnect: A telehealth, low-barrier buprenorphine bridge clinic in Philadelphia.The International journal on drug policy · 2024Article
- Reframing conceptualizations of primary care involvement in opioid use disorder treatment.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Community-Based Medications First for Opioid Use Disorder - Care Utilization and Mortality Outcomes.Substance abuse and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Low-Threshold Buprenorphine in Non-Traditional Settings: A Scoping Review.Substance use : research and treatmentReview
- Ending the overdose epidemic by ending the war on drug users: Can this work?Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPNArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: New approaches are needed to provide care for individuals with problematic opioid use (POU). Rapid access addiction medicine (RAAM) clinics offer a flexible, low-barrier, rapid access care model for this population. Objective: To assess the associations of RAAM clinics with emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and mortality for people with POU. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study involving a matched control group was performed using health administrative data from Ontario, Canada. Anonymized data from 4 Ontario RAAM clinics (cities of Ottawa, Toronto, Oshawa, and Sudbury) were linked with health administrative data. Analyses were performed on a cohort of individuals who received care at participating RAAM clinics and geographically matched controls who did not receive care at a RAAM clinic. All visits occurred between October 2, 2017, and October 30, 2019, and data analyses were completed in spring 2023. A propensity score-matching approach was used to balance confounding factors between groups, with adjustment for covariates that remained imbalanced after matching. Exposures: Individuals who initiated care through the RAAM model (including assessment, pharmacotherapy, brief counseling, harm reduction, triage to appropriate level of care, navigation to community services and primary care, and related care) were compared with individuals who did not receive care through the RAAM model. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite measure of ED visits for any reason, hospitalization for any reason, and all-cause mortality (all measured up to 30 days after index date). Outcomes up to 90 days after index date, as well as outcomes looking at opioid-related ED visits and hospitalizations, were also assessed. Results: In analyses of the sample of 876 patients formed using propensity score matching, 440 in the RAAM group (mean [SD] age, 36.5 [12.6] years; 276 [62.7%] male) and 436 in the control group (mean [SD] age, 36.8 [13.8] years; 258 [59.2%] male), the pooled odds ratio (OR) for the primary, 30-day composite outcome of all-cause ED visit, hospitalization, or mortality favored the RAAM model (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.92). Analysis of the same outcome for opioid-related reasons only also favored the RAAM intervention (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29-0.76). Findings for the individual events of hospitalization, ED visit, and mortality at both 30-day and 90-day follow-up also favored the RAAM model, with comparisons reaching statistical significance in most cases. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals with POU, RAAM clinics were associated with reductions in ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality. These findings provide valuable evidence toward a broadened adoption of the RAAM model in other regions of North America and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.