ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2024
Evaluation of a Pilot: Inspection Facilitation and Collaboration Using a Mixed Reality Device.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulating the AI-enabled ecosystem for human therapeutics.Communications medicine · 2025Review
- Community-Dwelling Filipino Older Adults' Experiences with Virtual Coach for Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA): A Phenomenology.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Reimagining drug regulation in the age of AI: a framework for the AI-enabled Ecosystem for Therapeutics.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic forced industry and national regulatory authorities (NRAs) to think about innovative ways to ensure business continuity, including Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) inspections. Even prior to COVID-19, it was understood that GMP site inspections, especially redundant inspections, are a time and resource-intensive process for both industry and regulators in high-income countries and often prohibitive to resource-challenged countries. Thus, we investigated the use of a mixed reality device and Microsoft (MS) Teams as a platform for mixed reality (hybrid) remote inspection. This pilot involved a mock GMP inspection of a drug manufacturing facility in the United States. The mock inspection was conducted by two former USFDA (US Food and Drug Administration) investigators, facilitated by representatives from Northeastern University along with The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Also participating in the inspection were inspectors from national regulatory agencies (NRAs) from the African continent, including Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe, and representatives from the Pre-Qualification Inspection Unit at the World Health Organization (WHO). Harmonized inspectional guidance from PIC/s (GMP Guide) and WHO (TRS 823) were used as the standards for conducting the mock inspection. We found that mixed reality, used in conjunction with a collaborative text messaging system, is a viable tool to facilitate remote inspections and allows inspectors participating remotely to write their own independent inspection reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.