ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024
Fertility care for all: impact of New York State's Medicaid expansion on infertility care.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health care experiences of individuals accessing or undergoingFrontiers in reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Moving toward Narrowing the United States Gap in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Next Decade.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess whether the New York State (NYS) mandate expanding Medicaid coverage of fertility diagnostic testing and treatment is successfully increasing patient access to and utilization of fertility care.
methodsA retrospective chart review was performed of NYS Medicaid patients who presented for fertility services to a large academic reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) clinic. Information on patient demographics, medical history, diagnostic testing, treatments, and outcomes was collected. Patients presenting to the clinic in the 1 year prior to the mandate (October 1, 2018-September 30, 2019) were compared to patients presenting in the 1 year after the mandate (October 1, 2019-September 30, 2020). Primary outcomes of the study were differences in presentation to the clinic between the two cohorts and differences in utilization of infertility diagnostic testing and treatment. Secondary outcomes were differences in treatment outcomes.
resultsA significantly larger percentage of Medicaid patients presented to the clinic for fertility assessment post-mandate (22%) as compared to pre-mandate (9%, p < 0.05). There were no demographic differences between the pre- and post-mandate patient groups. A similar percentage of patients completed diagnostic testing pre- vs. post-mandate. Post-mandate patients underwent more treatment cycles with ovulation induction medications compared to natural treatment cycles. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rates pre- vs. post-mandate.
conclusionThe NYS Medicaid mandate allowed a significantly larger percentage of Medicaid patients to present for fertility evaluation. The patients in the post-mandate cohort underwent more treatment cycles with ovulation induction medications compared to natural cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.