Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2024
Injection site number and outcomes of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA for refractory overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Alkalinised lidocaine as an anaesthetic before onabotulinumtoxinA injections. a randomised trial.BJU international · 2025Trial
- Does Injection Number Matter? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Bladder Botox for Overactive Bladder.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- The Efficacy of Intradetrusor Onabotulinumtoxin A Injection for Refractory Overactive Bladder Syndrome-A Single-Center Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Is Cystoscopic Intravesical Injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA Acceptable in an Outpatient Clinic?International neurourology journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe optimal number of onabotulinumtoxinA injections for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder syndrome is unknown. Our primary objective was to determine whether 10-injections sites with 100 units of onabotulinumtoxinA each were associated with less pain than 20-injections sites.
methodsIn a single-blinded randomized trial, 100 units of onabotulinumtoxinA was administered, either as 10 × 1 ml or as 20 × 0.5 ml injections following the instillation of 30 ml of bupivacaine and 5 ml of NaHCO
resultsFrom October 2020 to November 2022, a total of 56 patients were approached and 40 were enrolled and randomized to two groups (21 in the 10-injections group and 19 in 20-injections group). The difference in the median pain score between the group was not statistically significant (4 [1.5-5] for 10 injections vs 3 [1-4] for 20 injections, p=0.823).
conclusionPatients' perception of pain, efficacy, and adverse events did not significantly differ between patients receiving 10 and those receiving 20 injections of 100 units of onabotulinumtoxinA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.