Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37991352›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2023

Evaluation of lateral flow devices for postmortem rabies diagnosis in animals in the Philippines: a multicenter study.

Jeffrey L Cruz, Alyssa M Garcia, Nobuo Saito, Maria Glofezita O Lagayan, Rainelda C Dela Peña, Michael S Usana, Steciousneil P Agustin, Judith Z Tattao, Christine V Mamauag, Ofelia P Ducayag and 23 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Jeffrey L Cruz *Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Animal Industry , Quezon, Philippines.
Alyssa M Garcia *Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University , Yufu, Oita, Japan.
Nobuo SaitoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University , Yufu, Oita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4396-5000
Maria Glofezita O LagayanDepartment of Agriculture, Bureau of Animal Industry , Quezon, Philippines.
Rainelda C Dela PeñaDepartment of Agriculture, Bureau of Animal Industry , Quezon, Philippines.
Michael S UsanaRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory I, Sta Barbara , Pangasinan, Philippines.
Steciousneil P AgustinRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory I, Sta Barbara , Pangasinan, Philippines.
Judith Z TattaoRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory II , Tuguegarao, Cagayan, Philippines.
Christine V MamauagRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory II , Tuguegarao, Cagayan, Philippines.
Ofelia P DucayagRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory CAR , Baguio, Benguet, Philippines.
Heather Laxe F NabusRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory CAR , Baguio, Benguet, Philippines.
Princess Diana D L FloresRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory IVA , Lipa, Batangas, Philippines.
Ralph Joselle A FabonRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory IVA , Lipa, Batangas, Philippines.
Rogelio P PeñaflorRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory IVB , Naujan, Oriental Mindoro, Philippines.
Dave Christopher G ViñasRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory IVB , Naujan, Oriental Mindoro, Philippines.
Carla A LimsanRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory IVB - Satellite Laboratory , Puerto Princesa, Palawan, Philippines.
Rona P BernalesRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory V , Pili, Camarines Sur, Philippines.
Maria Erlinda T LlamesRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory V , Pili, Camarines Sur, Philippines.
Lerisa E BalopeñosRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory VI , Iloilo, Philippines.
Ramir G MoralesRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory VI , Iloilo, Philippines.
Ana Marie Cristina V MigriñoRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory VII , Mandaue, Cebu, Philippines.
Orfel June S CalunsagRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory VII , Mandaue, Cebu, Philippines.
Josephine J DatoyRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory IX , Zamboanga, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines.
Ken Y PalmaRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory IX , Zamboanga, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines.
Maria Corazon B SepulvedaDavao City Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory , Davao, Davao del Sur, Philippines.
Ma Noreen J EngDavao City Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory , Davao, Davao del Sur, Philippines.
Jobienaur S MoscosoRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory XII , General Santos, South Cotabato, Philippines.
Sheena Mae F JulabarRegional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory XII , General Santos, South Cotabato, Philippines.
Jaira D MauhayDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University , Yufu, Oita, Japan.
Mark Joseph M EspinoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University , Yufu, Oita, Japan.
Christine Joyce M JavierDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University , Yufu, Oita, Japan.
Kazunori KimitsukiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University , Yufu, Oita, Japan.
Akira NishizonoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University , Yufu, Oita, Japan.

Funding

MEXT | JST | Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) 17823721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expansion of the use of lateral flow devices (LFD) for animal rabies diagnosis can help mitigate the widespread underreporting of rabies. However, this has been hindered by the limited number and small sample size of previous studies. To overcome this limitation, we conducted a multicenter study with a larger sample size to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the ADTEC LFD for postmortem rabies diagnosis in animals. Thirteen governmental animal diagnostic laboratories in the Philippines were involved in this study, and 791 animals suspected of having rabies were tested using both the direct fluorescence antibody test (DFAT) and ADTEC LFD between August 2021 and October 2022. The LFD demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 94.1%-97.9%] and a specificity of 99.7% (95% CI: 98.4%-100%). Notably, false-negative results were more likely to occur in laboratories with lower annual processing volumes of rabies samples in the previous years (adjusted odds ratio 4.97, 95% CI: 1.49-16.53). In this multicenter study, the high sensitivity and specificity of the LFD for the diagnosis of animal rabies, compared to that of the DFAT, was demonstrated, yet concerns regarding false-negative results remain. In areas with limited experience in processing rabies samples, it is essential to provide comprehensive training and careful attention during implementation.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesRabiesRabies virusAnimalsDogsLaboratoriesPhilippinesSensitivity and Specificitylateral flow devicesmulticenter evaluationrabiesthe Philippines

Identifiers

PMID37991352
PMCPMC10729751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.