Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37991313›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2023

Customized corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments (CAIRS) for keratoconus with decentered asymmetric cone.

Soosan Jacob, Amar Agarwal, Shady T Awwad, Cosimo Mazzotta, Parnika Parashar, Sambath Jambulingam

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. CAIRS and nomograms: a narrative review.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Soosan JacobDepartment of Cornea, Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Amar AgarwalDepartment of Cornea, Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shady T AwwadDepartment of Ophthalmology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Cosimo MazzottaDepartmental Ophthalmology Unit, Alta Val D'elsa Hospital, USL Toscana Sudest, Italy.
Parnika ParasharDepartment of Cornea, Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sambath JambulingamDepartment of Cornea, Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital · INAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments (CAIRS) refer to the intracorneal placement of fresh, unprocessed, processed, preserved, or packaged allogenic rings/segments of any type/length. We described uniform-thickness CAIRS previously. We now describe a new technique of customized CAIRS to personalize the flattening effect as per individual topography. A prospective interventional case series of patients with pericentral/ paracentral decentered cones and gradation of keratometry with one side steeper than the other was conducted. Individually customized tapered CAIRS with variable volume, arc length, taper length, and gradient of taper were implanted. In total, 32 eyes of 29 patients with at least 1-year follow-up were included. Special double-bladed trephines and a CAIRS customizer template allowed the creation of individually customized CAIRS. Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.22 to 0.47 (P = 0.000) and from 0.76 to 0.89 (P = 0.001), respectively. Significant improvement was seen in K1, K2, Km, Kmax, topographic astigmatism, Q-value, sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent, Root Mean Square (RMS), Higher Order Aberrations (HOA), and vertical coma (P < 0.01, 0.05). There was no significant change in the width or height of CAIRS between 1 month and last visit on anterior-segment optical coherence tomography. Five eyes continued to remain at the same UDVA, 27 eyes had at least 2 lines, and 13 eyes had at least 3 or more lines improvement in UDVA. The maximum improvement in UDVA was 7 lines. A significant difference in flattening was obtained at different zones across the tapered CAIRS. Thus, differential flattening was achieved across the cone based on the customization plan. Personalized customization was possible for each cornea, unlike limited models of progressive-thickness synthetic segments. Allogenic nature, greater customizability, efficacy, and absent need for large inventories are advantages compared to synthetic segments.

Indexed as

KeratoconusCorneal StromaCorneal TopographyHumansProspective StudiesProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis ImplantationRefraction, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID37991313
PMCPMC10788746
OpenAlexW4388832484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.